Abstract:Efficient experimental designs aim to maximise the information obtained from stated choice data to estimate discrete choice models' parameters statistically efficiently. Almost without exception efficient experimental designs assume that decision-makers use a Random Utility Maximisation (RUM) decision rule. When using such designs, researchers (implicitly) assume that the decision rule used to generate the design has no impact on respondents' choice behaviour. This study investigates whether the decision rule assumption underlying an experimental design affects respondents' choice behaviour. We use four stated choice experiments on coastal adaptation to climate change: Two are based on experimental designs optimised for utility maximisation and two are based on experimental designs optimised for a mixture of RUM and Random Regret Minimisation (RRM). Generally, we find that respondents place value on adaptation measures (e.g., dykes and beach nourishments). We evaluate the models' fits and investigate whether some choice tasks particularly invoke RUM or RRM decision rules. For the latter, we develop a new sampling-based approach that avoids the confounding between preference and decision rule heterogeneity. We find no evidence that RUM-optimised designs invoke RUM-consistent choice behaviour. However, we find a relationship between some of the attributes and decision rules, and compelling evidence that some choice tasks invoke RUM consistent behaviour while others invoke RRM consistent behaviour. This implies that respondents' choice behaviour and choice modelling outcomes are not exogenous to the choice tasks, which can be particularly critical when information on preferences is used to inform actual decision-making on a sensitive issue of common interest as climate change.

Adapt/Exchange decisions depend on structural and surface features: Effects of solution costs and presentation format

Adapt/Exchange decisions or generic choices: Does framing influence how people integrate qualitatively different risks?

Information acquisition in Adapt/Exchange decisions: When do people check alternative solution principles?

A text-based analysis approach to representing the design selection process

Need, frames, and time constraints in risky decision-making

On the impact of decision rule assumptions in experimental designs on preference recovery: An application to climate change adaptation measures

An Experimental Study of Human Decisions in Sequential Information Acquisition in Design: Impact of Cost and Task Complexity

Mutual inclusivity improves decision-making by smoothing out choice’s competitive edge

Switching between different cognitive strategies induces switch costs as evidenced by switches between manual and mental object rotation

Facilitating and hindering factors for routine adaptations in manufacturing and effects on human performance- unexpected insights from three experimental studies in a special purpose setting

Designing Shared Information Displays for Agents of Varying Strategic Sophistication

Understanding of Emotions and Reasoning During Consumer Tradeoff Between Function and Aesthetics in Product Design

The need for an interaction cost model in adaptive interfaces

Framing Effects in Intertemporal Choices: 3 Two‐Step Experiments

Perceived Attractiveness of Structured Financial Products: The Role of Presentation Format and Reference Instruments

Cognitive adaptation and its consequences: a test of cognitive continuum theory

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk

People systematically overlook subtractive changes

Pitting intuitive and analytical thinking against each other: The case of transitivity

Decision Making of Maximizers and Satisficers Based on Collaborative Explanations

An adaptive approach to Bayesian Optimization with switching costs