Game Mining: How to Make Money from those about to Play a Game

James W. Bono,David H. Wolpert

2024-01-05

Abstract:It is known that a player in a noncooperative game can benefit by publicly restricting his possible moves before play begins. We show that, more generally, a player may benefit by publicly committing to pay an external party an amount that is contingent on the game's outcome. We explore what happens when external parties -- who we call ``game miners'' -- discover this fact and seek to profit from it by entering an outcome-contingent contract with the players. We analyze various structured bargaining games between miners and players for determining such an outcome-contingent contract. These bargaining games include playing the players against one another, as well as allowing the players to pay the miner(s) for exclusivity and first-mover advantage. We establish restrictions on the strategic settings in which a game miner can profit and bounds on the game miner's profit. We also find that game miners can lead to both efficient and inefficient equilibria.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses a concept called "Game Mining", which involves players profiting by publicly committing to pay a certain amount of money to a third party (referred to as a game miner) based on the outcome of the game in a non-cooperative game. The paper points out that when external game miners discover this phenomenon, they will try to profit by signing outcome-dependent contracts with players. The research analyzes different structures of bargaining games, including situations where players compete against each other and cases where players pay fees to game miners to gain priority.

The paper analyzes the strategic setting limits and profit caps that game miners may have for profitability, and finds that the existence of game miners can lead to equilibrium states where efficiency can be improved or reduced. In addition, the paper discusses the impact of temporal order on game mining, such as the advantage of being the first mover, and how game miners exploit this advantage to charge fees.

The authors also compare their work with relevant economic literature, such as Coase's theory, Jackson and Wilkie's models, Renou's research, and other studies on commitment and timing. They emphasize that game mining is a natural result of profit-driven behavior and does not require specific economic planning and regulatory mechanisms.

In summary, the core issue of this paper is how to use game miners as a role to change players' profits through outcome-dependent contracts in non-cooperative games, and how this affects the efficiency and equilibrium of the game.