Abstract:Background and Objective:The transfer of forces and moments between the bracket and archwire is decisive in the multi-band/bracket technique. New developments in bracket design and ligation method aim to optimize the transfer of forces and moments and improve leveling effectiveness. We thus aimed in this study to investigate whether leveling behavior is influenced by different bracket systems, or by the ligation method. The baseline situation for this examination was a complex tooth malalignment.Material and Methods:Using the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS), we tested the leveling effectiveness of nine self-ligating bracket systems made by various manufacturers (Forestadent-Quick®, in active and passive variants, Dentsply GAC In-Ovation®, adenta TIME®, Ormco Damon® 2 and Damon® 3MX, UP-Dental Opal-M™ and Opal™-2, Strite SPEED™) in the 0.022 inch slot system. A conventional bracket system (Dentaurum discovery®) was used for reference purposes. We also used a multistranded steel archwire (Ormco Tripleflex™, 0.44 mm round) and four nickel-titanium archwires of various diameters (Forestadent® BioStarter® 0.30 mm round, BioStarter® 0.40 mm round, Titanol® Low Force 0.40 × 0.40 mm2 and Titanol® Low Force 0.40 × 0.56 mm2). The leveling task consisted of correcting a complex malalignment (infraocclusion and vestibular displacement, each of 2 mm) of tooth 21. We analyzed the forces and torque movements that arose during the leveling phase.Results:The test of the ten bracket systems revealed no significant difference in terms of their leveling effectiveness. Both selfligating brackets and conventional brackets behaved similarly, and we observed roughly 80% of the infraocclusions to have been corrected. Vestibular displacement was corrected with all the bracket systems by as much as 100% or even more due to a developing torque movement. The influence of wire material and wire diameter became apparent in relation to existing forces durconvening the leveling stage; those factors’ influence was clearly greater than that of the ligation method.Conclusions:This study’s results demonstrate that bracket selection has a negligible influence on leveling effectiveness. Although self-ligating brackets are easier for the orthodontist to manipulate and provide patients with esthetic and wearing comfort advantages, they are not superior to conventional brackets in terms of their biomechanical characteristics.

The 2D lingual appliance system

Treatment of Angle classⅡmalocclusion with SUS2 appliance at early stage of permanent dentition

Clinical Application of Lingual Two-Dimensional Appliance: A Primary Study

Lingual orthodontic appliances: invisible braces.

Invisible treatment with lingual appliance for the correction of an adult class II subdivision with asymmetrical Wilson and Spee curves: A case report

Study on the angulation between the labial and lingual surfaces of anterior maxillary teeth for the creation of an innovative concept of an adjustable lingual brace

Development of lingual brachet technique. (Esthetic and hygienic approach to orthodontic treatment) (Part 1) Background and design

Esthetic outcomes in orthodontics through digital customization with a lingual appliance system

Invisible treatment of an asymmetric adult class II malocclusion related to unilateral upper lateral incisor agenesis with a straight wire lingual appliance, mini-screw and premolar extraction: A case report

Evaluation of angulation between labial & lingual surfaces of crown of anterior teeth & 3D mapping lingual surface for development of concept of new preadjusted lingual bracket

Lingual Orthodontics: The Invisible Braces

Clinical features of lingual orthodontics

Application of Passive Self-ligating Brackets in Orthodontic Treatment

Lingual orthodontics as an aesthetic resource in the preparation of orthodontic/surgical treatment

Lingual Orthodontics: A Systemic Review

[Re-evaluating the clinical implications of clear aligners and lingual appliances - a retrospective and prospective overview]

The Leveling Effectiveness of Self-ligating and Conventional Brackets for Complex Tooth Malalignments

The preliminary study on individualized bracket system in lingual orthodontics

Microstructural and mechanical characterization of contemporary lingual orthodontic brackets

Miniscrew-assisted customized lingual appliances for predictable treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion with severe deep overbite and overjet

The treatment of severe class II division 2 patients with deep overbites and gummy smiles using lingual appliances: a case series