Sustainable justice Sustainability for the Forgotten Gary E. Machlis University of Utah Press, 2024. 262 pp.

Andrea Berardi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado9248

IF: 56.9

2024-04-27

Science

Abstract:The needs of marginalized groups must be central to sustainability goals, argues a sociologist

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Sustainability justice: a systematic review of emergent trends and themes

Darren McCauley,Alberto Quintavalla,Kostina Prifti,Constanze Binder,Felicia Broddén,Hannah van den Brink

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01565-8

IF: 6

2024-09-15

Sustainability Science

Abstract:There is a growing importance of understanding the connection between sustainability and justice. We have conducted the first robust mixed-methods review of the burgeoning academic literature on sustainability justice. Our analysis spans literature from 2013 to 2023, drawn from the databases of Web of Science and Scopus. We use a scientometric approach to identify key literature for a more detailed qualitative analysis. This dual approach uncovers key trends and themes in sustainability justice. The review identifies works that delve into the themes of environmental, social, and economic justice, pinpointing a need to amplify Global South voices, narratives, and insights for a comprehensive understanding of sustainability justice. The findings indicate a pressing need for integrating economic aspects with social and environmental factors, advocating for more focus on transformative justice.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
Are social justice and sustainability interdependent? If so, how and under what conditions?

Kjell Y. Törnblom,Răzvan‐Gabriel Popa,Pius Krütli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3177

IF: 12.5

2024-09-04

Sustainable Development

Abstract:Sustainability often entails dealing with issues of justice in the distribution of goods and bads, such as resources and restrictions. Applications of justice to concrete situations, including what is deserved and entitled, call for specifications of several issues, like the meaning of "deservingness" and "entitlement" and how justice should be accomplished. This is a key aspect for sustainability, as social arrangements that are not experienced as fair may not be long‐lived. Conversely, justice may be an empty notion unless it is sustainable. With this in mind, we provide an inventory of factors to analyze the relationship between (un)sustainability and social (in)justice from a social psychological perspective. We (a) clarify the gist of the two subjective notions, (b) discuss their interdependences, (c) provide a list of factors for analyses, and (d) illustrate how they may be applied to two cases, one at a global level (food accessibility) and the other at a local level (distribution of renewable energy resources in communities). The proposed framework forms the basis of empirical analyses of the social dimension of sustainability.

green & sustainable science & technology,regional & urban planning,development studies
From sustainable development to social-ecological justice: Addressing taboos and naturalizations in order to shift perspective

Katrin Grossmann,James JT Connolly,Małgorzata Dereniowska,Giulio Mattioli,Luca Nitschke,Nicola Thomas,Anaïs Varo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211029427

2021-07-11

Abstract:While sustainability was introduced as a game-changing idea, it has often been criticized for its vagueness and its over-accommodating bent toward powerful, vested interests, economic growth, and profit seeking—or, on the contrary, for not being able to enter mainstream politics. As a result, in the current political climate, sustainability policies seem to be everywhere, but so does the social and ecological critique of these policies. In this article, we articulate the seeds of an emerging cross-sectoral shift away from sustainability and toward social-ecological justice. Coming from a multidisciplinary background, we explore commonalities in the shortcomings of sustainability agendas and identify discursive barriers to change across three critical fields: transport, energy, and urban greening. Within each of these fields, we observe an upswing of scholarly work addressing the pitfalls and trade-offs of sustainability, but we also show how taboos and naturalizations embedded in these fields hinder adequately questioning the economy’s role in sustainability thinking and action. To develop our argument that there is an emerging cross-sectoral push away from sustainability agendas and toward social-ecological justice goals, we briefly examine the current state of the wider sustainability discourse together with its critique from a social and ecological justice angle. We then review relevant academic work across the applied fields of transport, energy, and urban greening, focusing on the normative and analytical aspects dealt with, and how they address and conceptualize tensions between the different dimensions of sustainability. In the concluding section, we highlight how a focus on sectoral and local tensions between ecological, economic, and social policy goals uncovers the ways in which injustices or environmental degradation are continually reproduced, despite the sustainability framework. We conclude with suggestions for thinking and acting under the umbrella of social-ecological justice.
Urban Ecosystem Justice

Scott Kellogg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367858711

2021-07-21

Abstract:Merging together the fields of urban ecology, environmental justice, and urban environmental education, Urban Ecosystem Justice promotes building fair, accessible, and mutually beneficial relationships between citizens and the soils, water, atmospheres, and biodiversity in their cities. This book provides a framework for recentering issues of justice and fairness in sustainability discourse while challenging the profound ecological alienation experienced by urban residents. While the urban sustainability movement has had many successes in the past few decades, there remain areas for it to grow. For one, the benefits of sustainability have disproportionately benefited wealthier city residents, with concerns over equity, justice, and social sustainability frequently taking a back seat to economic and environmental considerations. Additionally, many city dwellers remain estranged from and unfamiliar with ecological processes, with urban environments often thought of as existing outside of nature or as hopelessly degraded. Through a citizen-centered lens, the book offers a guide to reconciling these issues by demonstrating how questions of equity, access, and justice apply to the biophysical dimensions of the urban ecosystem: soil, water, air, waste, and biodiversity. Drawing heavily from the fields of urban ecology, environmental justice, and ecological design, this book lays out a science of cities for people: a pedagogical platform that can be used to promote ecological literacy in underrepresented urban communities through affordable and decentralized means. This book provides both a theoretical and practical field guide to students and researchers of urban sustainability, city planners, architects, policymakers, and activists wishing to develop reciprocal relationships with urban ecologies.
Sustainable Development and Social Justice: Conflicting Urgencies and the Search for Common Ground in Urban and Regional Planning

Scott Campbell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/MJS.12333712.0001.007

2013-09-01

Abstract:This essay examines urban planning’s recent engagement with two social movements sustainability and social justice ‐ and the field’s efforts to simultaneously pursue both impulses. What arises from the juxtaposition of these two lofty goals? I develop three arguments. First, rather than prematurely speaking of a convergence between environmental sustainability and social justice, planners might better approach this encounter as a productive tension of two still incongruent movements. Second, before planners can negotiate a merger of sustainability and social justice, they first ought to directly confront the political imbalance between the two: middle-class environmental interests typically trump the interests of the poor and marginalized, too often leading to an exclusionary sustainability of privilege rather than a sustainability of inclusion. Third, despite the perhaps inevitable criticisms of immeasurability and vagueness, sustainability has endured as a central principle in urban planning because its oppositional engagement with social justice and economic development continually reinvigorates sustainability planning, keeps the term relevant and inclusive, and grants the task of urban planning greater urgency.

Sociology,Political Science,Environmental Science
Sustainable and Resilient Systems for Intergenerational Justice

Sahar Zandi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.09122

2021-02-18

General Economics

Abstract:Rawls' theory of justice aims at fairness. He does not only think of justice between exiting parties in existing society, but he also thinks of it between generations intergenerational justice problem. Rawls' solution to this problem is the saving principle, and he says that we are responsible for being just with the next generations. Wolf thinks of our responsibility for future generations as a kind of financial debt that we have to pay. He also develops the meaning of "saving" and says that it is not restricted to the monetary one. Wolf extends the definition of "saving" such that it includes investment on behalf of the next generations as well. In this paper, I want to extend the meaning of "saving" to "using the resources for sustainable and resilient systems." By referring to the problem of time, I show that our decision on behalf of the next generations will be rational only if we entirely use the natural resources and wealth to produce sustainable and resilient systems.
Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability

Jasper O. Kenter,Christopher M. Raymond,Carena J. van Riper,Elaine Azzopardi,Michelle R. Brear,Fulvia Calcagni,Ian Christie,Michael Christie,Anne Fordham,Rachelle K. Gould,Christopher D. Ives,Adam P. Hejnowicz,Richard Gunton,Andra-Ioana Horcea-Milcu,Dave Kendal,Jakub Kronenberg,Julian R. Massenberg,Seb O’Connor,Neil Ravenscroft,Andrea Rawluk,Ivan J. Raymond,Jorge Rodríguez-Morales,Samarthia Thankappan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00726-4

IF: 6

2019-08-24

Sustainability Science

Abstract:This paper concludes a special feature of Sustainability Science that explores a broad range of social value theoretical traditions, such as religious studies, social psychology, indigenous knowledge, economics, sociology, and philosophy. We introduce a novel transdisciplinary conceptual framework that revolves around concepts of 'lenses' and 'tensions' to help navigate value diversity. First, we consider the notion of lenses: perspectives on value and valuation along diverse dimensions that describe what values focus on, how their sociality is envisioned, and what epistemic and procedural assumptions are made. We characterise fourteen of such dimensions. This provides a foundation for exploration of seven areas of tension, between: (1) the values of individuals vs collectives; (2) values as discrete and held vs embedded and constructed; (3) value as static or changeable; (4) valuation as descriptive vs normative and transformative; (5) social vs relational values; (6) different rationalities and their relation to value integration; (7) degrees of acknowledgment of the role of power in navigating value conflicts. In doing so, we embrace the 'mess' of diversity, yet also provide a framework to organise this mess and support and encourage active transdisciplinary collaboration. We identify key research areas where such collaborations can be harnessed for sustainability transformation. Here it is crucial to understand how certain social value lenses are privileged over others and build capacity in decision-making for understanding and drawing on multiple value, epistemic and procedural lenses.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
Europe Moves toward Pragmatic Sustainability: A More Human and Fraternal Approach

Idiano D’Adamo,Massimo Gastaldi,Manoj Kumar Nallapaneni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146161

IF: 3.9

2024-07-19

Sustainability

Abstract:"Sustainable by passion and deliberate choice, not mere interest" This is the first message that young people should read, as should more mature adults [...]

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
The macroecology of sustainability.

Joseph R Burger,Craig D Allen,James H Brown,William R Burnside,Ana D Davidson,Trevor S Fristoe,Marcus J Hamilton,Norman Mercado-Silva,Jeffrey C Nekola,Jordan G Okie,Wenyun Zuo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001345

IF: 9.8

2012-01-01

PLoS Biology

Abstract:The discipline of sustainability science has emerged in response to concerns of natural and social scientists, policymakers, and lay people about whether the Earth can continue to support human population growth and economic prosperity. Yet, sustainability science has developed largely independently from and with little reference to key ecological principles that govern life on Earth. A macroecological perspective highlights three principles that should be integral to sustainability science: 1) physical conservation laws govern the flows of energy and materials between human systems and the environment, 2) smaller systems are connected by these flows to larger systems in which they are embedded, and 3) global constraints ultimately limit flows at smaller scales. Over the past few decades, decreasing per capita rates of consumption of petroleum, phosphate, agricultural land, fresh water, fish, and wood indicate that the growing human population has surpassed the capacity of the Earth to supply enough of these essential resources to sustain even the current population and level of socio-economic development.
Urban sustainability and environmental justice: evaluating the linkages in public planning/policy discourse

Hamil Pearsall,Joseph Pierce

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.487528

IF: 3.59

2010-07-01

Local Environment

Abstract:Many cities' municipal governments have made some version of “sustainability” an explicit policy goal over the past two decades. Previous research has documented how the operationalisation and conceptualisation of sustainability in urban sustainability plans vary greatly among cities, particularly with respect to environmental justice. This article reports on whether and how large American cities incorporate environmental justice into their urban sustainability indicator projects. Our findings suggest that while there has been an increase in the number of cities incorporating environmental justice elements into sustainability plans since the early 2000s, their conceptualizations and implementations of sustainability remain highly constrained. The paucity of evaluative tools suggests that environmental justice efforts are potentially losing traction in public debate over macro-scale sustainability concerns (e.g. climate change) or the need for regionally competitive environmental amenities (e.g. parks). This paper concludes with suggestions for revising existing sustainability plans to better reflect environmental justice concerns.

environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology,geography,regional & urban planning,urban studies
Urban sustainability in an age of enduring inequalities: Advancing theory and ecometrics for the 21st-century city

Robert J Sampson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614433114

2017-08-22

Abstract:The environmental fragility of cities under advanced urbanization has motivated extensive efforts to promote the sustainability of urban ecosystems and physical infrastructures. Less attention has been devoted to neighborhood inequalities and fissures in the civic infrastructure that potentially challenge social sustainability and the capacity of cities to collectively address environmental challenges. This article draws on a program of research in three American cities-Boston, Chicago, and Los Angeles-to develop hypotheses and methodological strategies for assessing how the multidimensional and multilevel inequalities that characterize contemporary cities bear on sustainability. In addition to standard concerns with relative inequality in income, the article reviews evidence on compounded deprivation, racial cleavages, civic engagement, institutional cynicism, and segregated patterns of urban mobility and organizational ties that differentially connect neighborhood resources. Harnessing "ecometric" measurement tools and emerging sources of urban data with a theoretically guided framework on neighborhood inequality can enhance the pursuit of sustainable cities, both in the United States and globally.
Tracing sustainability meanings in Rosendal: interrogating an unjust urban sustainability discourse and introducing alternative perspectives

Malin Bäckman,Katarina Pettersson,Lotten Westberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2023.2300956

IF: 3.59

2024-01-10

Local Environment

Abstract:Sustainability is a much debated concept, often criticised as ill-defined. While some argue it is time to leave sustainability behind, others defend the concept's potential to initiate change. In this article we depart from the potential of sustainability, while being aware that the term is often appropriated by discourses reproducing status quo and keeping existing injustices in place. We do so by studying the urban sustainability discourse reproducing certain types of sustainabilities in Rosendal, a developing urban district in Uppsala, Sweden. Guided by the "What's the problem represented to be" approach we analyse written and visual material, produced by Uppsala municipality and developers. Through the policy analysis we identify four intertwined meanings of sustainability: Everyone is included , It's all about aesthetics , Closeness to nature and Sustainability is easy . Together, these meanings shape the Sustainability in Rosendal discourse, which we argue does little to overcome existing injustices. We point towards the silences involved in the discourse and hold that the failure to question the growth-dependent economic system within which Rosendal is being developed, results in insignificant changes as opposed to just transformation. By building upon the notion of just sustainabilities, we outline a set of alternative perspectives, departing from coupling a pluralist understanding of justice with a feminist ethics of care, to open up for more emancipatory and transformative urban sustainability discourses.

environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology,geography,regional & urban planning,urban studies
Governing sustainability or sustainable governance? Semantic constellations on the sustainability-governance intersection in academic literature

Marco Billi,Aldo Mascareño,José Edwards

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123523

IF: 11.1

2021-01-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:The concepts of sustainability and governance share an implicit relationship: sustainability has often been asserted to require suitable governance arrangements, which should, in turn, be sustainable. However, this semantic intersection requires more study. To contribute to this gap, this paper aims at: 1) identifying the meanings and interests that are mobilized when the two terms of sustainability and governance intersect within academic communication; and 2) observe semantic structures allowing for the sustainability-governance intersection to translate meanings between different academic communities. To pursue this aim, the study employed a computer-aided algorithm, called Latent Dirichlet Analysis, to produce and examine a topic model of 7.358 Web of Science-indexed papers published between 1992 and 2017. The analysis output 29 topics condensing key themes, concepts, and approaches in academic literature associating sustainability and governance. These were subsequently grouped into four semantic constellations of transversal meanings providing coherence to the heterogeneity of the field: a) governance of State-level sustainable development; b) governance of the sustainable use of natural resources; c) sustainable governance of integration and autonomy in a globalized world; and d) sustainable corporate governance. These results led to the conclusion that the growingly differentiated literature on sustainability and governance has tended to organize in a tightly-knit field, articulating distinct methodological and theoretical perspectives within a shared set of value commitments -the promotion of a sustainable future. Arguably, this has been made possible by the 'hybrid' character of the concept of sustainability, as much a description of the world as it is as a prescription of the world-to-be. Additionally, the study unveiled that the implicit relationship linking sustainability and governance has been running both ways, i.e. that governance may be framed as a way to achieve sustainability as much as sustainability can be depicted as a way to achieve governance.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
Making Sustainability Sustainable

Frank Montabon,Mark Pagell,Zhaohui Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12103

2015-01-01

Abstract:The vast majority of research and practice regarding sustainable supply chains has followed an instrumental logic, which has led firms and supply chain managers to place economic interests ahead of environmental and social interests. Evidence that firms are attempting to become less unsustainable is mounting, but compensating practices such as offsetting a supply chain's negative impact on the environment and society do not create truly sustainable supply chains. This conceptual study seeks to move the field from the question of how can firms merely diminish environmental or social problems to how supply chains can become truly sustainable. To that end, we review the major weaknesses in previous logics and develop an Ecologically Dominant logic where environment and social interests supersede economic interests. To encourage a wider adoption of our perspective, the study illustrates how the Ecologically Dominant logic can advance practice and research. We do this by providing examples drawn from practice and our previous research and by offering propositions to encourage future research.
Sustainability in the Built Environment: The Galapagos Experience

Analia Lourdes Pastran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2024.3363784

2024-04-12

IEEE Technology and Society Magazine

Abstract:Since 2020, residents of cities, especially the poor and vulnerable, have been disproportionately affected by the social, economic, and political consequences of the COVID pandemic and other global crises.

engineering, electrical & electronic
Sustainable paradise lost: competing and complementary discussions on sustainability

Junesoo Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04711-5

IF: 4.08

2024-03-16

Environment Development and Sustainability

Abstract:Why do conflicts arise even when we all aim for sustainability? Simply using the term "sustainability" does not eliminate disagreements. This is because discussions about sustainability are so varied that reaching a consensus can be challenging. To address these conflicts, it's crucial to systematically understand their origins. With this perspective, this study delved into existing management literature on sustainability to explore: (1) how conversations about sustainability differ based on its boundaries, references, rationales, subjects, and objects, and (2) how these differing views can potentially complement each other. The results offer both theoretical and practical insights on how sustainability concepts and practices may be sustained.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
Sustaining Sustainability: Creating a Systems Science in a Fragmented Academy and Polarized World

John D. Sterman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3188-6_2

IF: 6

2012-01-01

Sustainability Science

Abstract:From climate change, deforestation, and depletion of fossil fuels to overexploited fisheries, species extinction, and poisons in our food and water, our society is unsustainable and it is getting worse fast. Many advocate that overcoming these problems requires the development of systems thinking. We have long been told that the unsustainability of our society arises because we treat the world as unlimited and problems unconnected when we live on a finite “spaceship Earth” in which “there is no away” and “everything is connected to everything else.” The challenge lies in moving from slogans to specific tools and processes that help us understand complexity, design better policies, facilitate individual and organizational learning, and catalyze the technical, economic, social, political, and personal changes we need to create a sustainable society. Here I outline a design for a systems science of sustainability that rises to this challenge. Where the dynamics of complex systems are conditioned by multiple feedbacks, time delays, accumulations, and nonlinearities, our mental models generally ignore these elements of dynamic complexity; where the consequences of our actions spill out across time and space and across disciplinary boundaries, our universities, corporations, and governments are organized in silos that focus on the short term and fragment knowledge. I describe how sustainability research, teaching, and engagement with the policy process can be organized to provide scientifically grounded, reliable knowledge that crosses disciplinary boundaries, that engages multiple stakeholders, that grapples with unavoidable issues of ethics, values, and purpose, and that leads to action.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
Earth stewardship: Shaping a sustainable future through interacting policy and norm shifts

F. Stuart Chapin,Elke U. Weber,Elena M. Bennett,Reinette Biggs,Jeroen van den Bergh,W. Neil Adger,Anne-Sophie Crépin,Stephen Polasky,Carl Folke,Marten Scheffer,Kathleen Segerson,John M. Anderies,Scott Barrett,Juan-Camilo Cardenas,Stephen R. Carpenter,Joern Fischer,Nils Kautsky,Simon A. Levin,Jason F. Shogren,Brian Walker,James Wilen,Aart de Zeeuw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01721-3

IF: 6.94

2022-04-05

AMBIO

Abstract:Abstract Transformation toward a sustainable future requires an earth stewardship approach to shift society from its current goal of increasing material wealth to a vision of sustaining built, natural, human, and social capital—equitably distributed across society, within and among nations. Widespread concern about earth’s current trajectory and support for actions that would foster more sustainable pathways suggests potential social tipping points in public demand for an earth stewardship vision. Here, we draw on empirical studies and theory to show that movement toward a stewardship vision can be facilitated by changes in either policy incentives or social norms. Our novel contribution is to point out that both norms and incentives must change and can do so interactively. This can be facilitated through leverage points and complementarities across policy areas, based on values, system design, and agency. Potential catalysts include novel democratic institutions and engagement of non-governmental actors, such as businesses, civic leaders, and social movements as agents for redistribution of power. Because no single intervention will transform the world, a key challenge is to align actions to be synergistic, persistent, and scalable.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
Development Goals towards Sustainability

Syed Mithun Ali,Andrea Appolloni,Fausto Cavallaro,Assunta Di Vaio,Francesco Ferella,Massimo Gastaldi,Muhammad Ikram,Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar,Michael Alan Martin,Abdul-Sattar Nizami,Ilhan Ozturk,Maria Pia Riccardi,Paolo Rosa,Ernesto Santibanez Gonzalez,Claudio Sassanelli,Davide Settembre-Blundo,Rajesh Kumar Singh,Marzena Smol,Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis,Irene Voukkali,Nan Yang,Antonis A. Zorpas,Idiano D'Adamo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129443

IF: 3.9

2023-06-13

Sustainability

Abstract:Sustainability's growth, year after year, continues to be staggering, becoming a reference point for those working on these issues [...]

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Constructing the narrative of the sustainability fix: Sustainability, social justice and representation in Austin, TX

Joshua Long

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014560501

2014-12-05

Urban Studies

Abstract:In recent years Austin, Texas has gained popular recognition as a ‘sustainable city’ while experiencing robust economic growth. Austin’s ability to resolve many of the political tensions between development and environmental protection have made it a favoured case study for North American policymakers who seek to mimic the ‘Austin model’. However, despite recognised environmental achievements, the popular storyline of Austin’s move toward sustainability overlooks key aspects of sustainable development, including equitable political representation, affordability, displacement of vulnerable populations and other social justice issues. Using While et al.’s ‘sustainability fix’ as a conceptual framework, this paper explores the historical development, ideological construction and strategic implementation of Austin’s sustainability agenda. In doing so, this paper moves beyond a lateral understanding of sustainability rhetoric toward a more nuanced and critical analysis of the selective promotion and implementation of sustainability agendas, as well as the consequences they have for social justice and equity in the ‘sustainable cities’ of the 21st century.

environmental studies,urban studies

Sustainable justice Sustainability for the Forgotten Gary E. Machlis University of Utah Press, 2024. 262 pp.

Sustainability justice: a systematic review of emergent trends and themes

Are social justice and sustainability interdependent? If so, how and under what conditions?

From sustainable development to social-ecological justice: Addressing taboos and naturalizations in order to shift perspective

Urban Ecosystem Justice

Sustainable Development and Social Justice: Conflicting Urgencies and the Search for Common Ground in Urban and Regional Planning

Sustainable and Resilient Systems for Intergenerational Justice

Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability

Europe Moves toward Pragmatic Sustainability: A More Human and Fraternal Approach

The macroecology of sustainability.

Urban sustainability and environmental justice: evaluating the linkages in public planning/policy discourse

Urban sustainability in an age of enduring inequalities: Advancing theory and ecometrics for the 21st-century city

Tracing sustainability meanings in Rosendal: interrogating an unjust urban sustainability discourse and introducing alternative perspectives

Governing sustainability or sustainable governance? Semantic constellations on the sustainability-governance intersection in academic literature

Making Sustainability Sustainable

Sustainability in the Built Environment: The Galapagos Experience

Sustainable paradise lost: competing and complementary discussions on sustainability

Sustaining Sustainability: Creating a Systems Science in a Fragmented Academy and Polarized World

Earth stewardship: Shaping a sustainable future through interacting policy and norm shifts

Development Goals towards Sustainability

Constructing the narrative of the sustainability fix: Sustainability, social justice and representation in Austin, TX