Abstract:The clustering problem is a difficult problem for the data stream domain. This is because the large volumes of data arriving in a stream renders most traditional algorithms too inefficient. In recent years, a few one-pass clustering algorithms have been developed for the data stream problem. Although such methods address the scalability issues of the clustering problem, they are generally blind to the evolution of the data and do not address the following issues: (1) The quality of the clusters is poor when the data evolves considerably over time. (2) A data stream clustering algorithm requires much greater functionality in discovering and exploring clusters over different portions of the stream. The widely used practice of viewing data stream clustering algorithms as a class of one-pass clustering algorithms is not very useful from an application point of view. For example, a simple one-pass clustering algorithm over an entire data stream of a few years is dominated by the outdated history of the stream. The exploration of the stream over different time windows can provide the users with a much deeper understanding of the evolving behavior of the clusters. At the same time, it is not possible to simultaneously perform dynamic clustering over all possible time horizons for a data stream of even moderately large volume. This paper discusses a fundamentally different philosophy for data stream clustering which is guided by application-centered requirements. The idea is divide the clustering process into an online component which periodically stores detailed summary statistics and an offine component which uses only this summary statistics. The offine component is utilized by the analyst who can use a wide variety of inputs (such as time horizon or number of clusters) in order to provide a quick understanding of the broad clusters in the data stream. The problems of efficient choice, storage, and use of this statistical data for a fast data stream turns out to be quite tricky. For this purpose, we use the concepts of a pyramidal time frame in conjunction with a microclustering approach. Our performance experiments over a number of real and synthetic data sets illustrate the effectiveness, efficiency, and insights provided by our approach.

On Robust Clustering of Temporal Point Process

A clustering algorithm for distributed time-series data

Evolutionary Clustering of Streaming Trajectories

Evolutionary Robust Clustering Over Time for Temporal Data

Guest Editorial Robust Learning of Spatio-Temporal Point Processes: Modeling, Algorithm, and Applications

Point processes with event time uncertainty

A Bayesian Mixture Model of Temporal Point Processes with Determinantal Point Process Prior

A point process model for rare event detection

A Bounded-Size Clustering Algorithm on Fully-Dynamic Streaming Graphs

An Efficient and Distributed Framework for Real-Time Trajectory Stream Clustering

DBSTC: an Effective Method for Discovering Cluster Features with Different Spatiotemporal Densities

Time Perception Machine: Temporal Point Processes for the When, Where and What of Activity Prediction

Distributed Data Stream Clustering: A Fast EM-based Approach

Learning Mixture of Neural Temporal Point Processes for Multi-dimensional Event Sequence Clustering.

An Empirical Study: Extensive Deep Temporal Point Process

A framework for clustering evolving data streams

Online Estimation and Community Detection of Network Point Processes for Event Streams

C-NTPP: Learning Cluster-Aware Neural Temporal Point Process.

MOStream: A Modular and Self-Optimizing Data Stream Clustering Algorithm

Streaming Hierarchical Clustering Based on Point-Set Kernel

Temporal Point Process Graphical Models