Efficacy and safety of continuous passive motion and physical therapy in recovery from knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhengfeng Jia,Yan Zhang,Wupeng Zhang,Cheng Xu,Wanheng Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04536-y
IF: 2.6
2024-01-14
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Abstract:Continuous passive motion (CPM) is commonly used as a postoperative rehabilitation treatment, along with physical therapy, for postoperative knee rehabilitation. However, the comparison between the two in terms of efficacy in postoperative knee replacement recovery is unclear.
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve This paper aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) versus traditional physical therapy in postoperative rehabilitation following knee replacement surgery through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Specifically, the main objectives of the study are: 1. **Evaluate the effects of CPM and traditional physical therapy in postoperative rehabilitation**: This includes the range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint, pain scores, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications. 2. **Explore the cost-effectiveness of CPM versus traditional physical therapy**: Compare the differences in treatment costs between the two methods. 3. **Verify whether CPM can significantly improve patient rehabilitation outcomes**: Particularly in terms of ROM, pain management, and patient satisfaction. Through these comparisons, the study hopes to provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice to guide rehabilitation strategies following knee replacement surgery.