Effects of age and captivity on the social structure and migration survival of a critically endangered bird

L. T. Bussolini,V. R. Franks,R. Heinsohn,D. Stojanovic
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12943
2024-04-24
Animal Conservation
Abstract:The wild population of orange‐bellied parrots has been supplemented with releases of captive‐bred individuals for many years, but survival rates vary significantly between different demographic groups. We investigated the social structure of wild‐living parrots and confirm that while juveniles and adults display different social structures, captive‐bred individuals are socially integrated into the population and have the same social patterns as wild birds. Additionally, there was no impact of social position on individual survival. Reintroductions of threatened species is a conservation strategy utilised around the world. Unfortunately, many translocated individuals have poor rates of survival post‐release. If released individuals are unable to socially integrate into wild populations, they might lose the safety of the group or fail to learn critical skills. We examined the effects of age and captivity on sociality and migration survival for the critically endangered orange‐bellied parrot (Neophema chrysogaster). As part of recovery efforts, adult birds are released in spring to contribute to breeding and juveniles are released in autumn prior to migration. Historically, captive‐bred adults have low rates of migration survival, whereas captive and wild juveniles survive at comparable rates. We investigated both the long‐term impacts of captivity on sociality and how sociality impacted migration survival by constructing social networks and comparing captive and wild birds of different age classes. We found no differences between captive and wild birds, suggesting that released birds integrated into the population. However, juveniles were more strongly connected and demonstrated greater network stability than adults. While we found no impact of sociality on survival, our results provide evidence of different migration strategies previously described for juveniles and adults: adults depart in small groups and juveniles depart as a larger flock a few weeks later. We suggest that the low migration survival of captive‐bred adults may be attributable to this cohort missing the juvenile flocking phase. These results suggest that a juvenile developmental phase may be impactful in this species for future survival.
biodiversity conservation,ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?