Abstract:CO2 hydrogenation for the acquisition of value-added chemicals is an economical means to deal with the CO2-relevant environmental problems, among which CO2 reduction to CH4 is an excellent model reaction for investigating the initial steps of CO2 hydrogenation. For the supported catalysts commonly used in such reactions, the tailoring of the interfacial effect between metal centers and supporting materials so as to obtain superior low-temperature CO2 methanation performance is a significant but challenging subject. In this work, we altered the size regimes of the Ru deposits in Ru/CeO2 assemblies and uncovered the competitive relationship between the strong metal support interactions (SMSI) and the H-spillover effect in determining the methanation activities by some ex situ and in situ spectroscopic techniques coupled with density functional theory (DFT) calculations. For CeO2 nanowire supported single Ru atoms, Ru nanoclusters (ca. 1.2 nm in size), and large Ru nanoparticles (ca. 4.0 nm in size), the nanoclusters show the most outstanding low -temperature CO2 methanation activity and 98-100% selectivity, with a turnover frequency (TOF) of 7.41 x 10(-3) s(-1) at 190 degrees C. The negative CO2 reaction order decreases their absolute values from single atoms to nanoclusters and turns positive in nanoparticles, while the positive H-2 reaction order follows the reverse tendency. In situ DRIFTS measurements demonstrate that the dominant reaction pathway is the CO route, in which metal carbonyls are the critical intermediates and the active sites are those Ce3+-OH sites and Ru sites near the metal support interfaces in charge of CO2 dissociation and carbonyl hydrogenation, respectively. Meanwhile, the strongest SMSI and H-spillover effect are respectively encountered in supported single Ru atoms and large Ru nanoparticles, with the activation of metal carbonyls and the dehydration of the support surfaces suppressed correspondingly. The two factors reach a balance in CeO2-supported Ru nanoclusters, and the methanation activity is therefore maximized. A mechanistic understanding of the interfacial effect in tuning the CO2 methanation activities would shed light on the ingenious design of the CO2 hydrogenation catalysts to utilize the SMSI and H-spillover effect to an appropriate degree and avoid their possible suppressions that would take place in extreme cases.

Dependency of CO2 methanation on the strong metal-support interaction for supported Ni/CeO2 catalysts

Tailoring metal-support interactions via tuning CeO2 particle size for enhancing CO2 methanation activity over Ni/CeO2 catalysts

Enhancing the CO2 methanation activity of Ni/CeO2 via activation treatment-determined metal-support interaction

Modulating CO 2 methanation activity on Ni/CeO 2 catalysts by tuning ceria facet-induced metal-support interaction

CO2 Methanation over the Ni-based Catalysts Supported on Nano-Ceo2 with Varied Morphologies

Mesoporous Ce-Zr Solid Solutions Supported Ni-based Catalysts for Low-Temperature CO2 Methanation by Tuning the Reaction Intermediates

Support effect on Ni-based mono- and bimetallic catalysts in CO2 hydrogenation

CO2 methanation over Ni nanoparticles inversely loaded with CeO2 and Cr2O3: Catalytic functions of metal oxide/Ni interfaces

Niobium Modification of CeO2 Tuning Electron Density of Nickel-Ceria Interfacial Sites for Enhanced CO2 Methanation

CO2 methanation on Ni-Ce0.8M0.2O2 (M=Zr, Sn or Ti) catalyst: Suppression of CO via formation of bridging carbonyls on nickel

Gas-induced Modulation of the Surface Structure of a Ni/Al2O3-CeO2 Catalyst in CO Methanation

A detailed characterization study of Ni/CeO 2 catalysts identifies Ni availability as the primary factor affecting CO 2 methanation performance

Enhanced CO2 Methanation Activity of Ni/Anatase Catalyst by Tuning Strong Metal–Support Interactions

Low-Temperature CO2 Methanation over CeO2-Supported Ru Single Atoms, Nanoclusters, and Nanoparticles Competitively Tuned by Strong Metal–Support Interactions and H-Spillover Effect

Effect of Oxide Support on Catalytic Performance of FeNi‐based Catalysts for CO2‐assisted Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane

CO2 Methanation on the Catalyst of Ni/MCM-41 Promoted with CeO2

Enhancement of hollow Ni/CeO2-Co3O4 for CO2 methanation: From CO2 adsorption and activation by synergistic effects

CO2 methanation over nickel-CeO2 catalyst supported on Al2O3: Different impregnation strategies and Ni-Ce ratios

Weakening the Metal–Support Interactions of M/CeO 2 (M = Co, Fe, Ni) Using a NH 3 -Treated CeO 2 Support for an Enhanced Water–Gas Shift Reaction

Weakening the Metal–Support Interactions of M/CeO2 (M = Co, Fe, Ni) Using a NH3-Treated CeO2 Support for an Enhanced Water–Gas Shift Reaction

Boosting CO2 methanation on ceria supported transition metal catalysts via chelation coupled wetness impregnation