Self-replicating Biophotoelectrochemistry System for Sustainable CO Methanation

Chao Wang,Jing Yu,Guoping Ren,Andong Hu,Xing Liu,Yiping Chen,Jie Ye,Shungui Zhou,Zhen He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08340
2022-03-15
Abstract:Efficient conversion of CO-rich gas to methane (CH4) provides an effective energy solution by taking advantage of existing natural gas infrastructures. However, traditional chemical and biological conversions face different challenges. Herein, an innovative biophotoelectrochemistry (BPEC) system using Methanosarcina barkeri-CdS as a biohybrid catalyst was successfully employed for CO methanation. Compared with CO2-fed BPEC, BPEC-CO significantly extended the CH4 producing time by 1.7-fold and exhibited a higher CH4 yield by 9.5-fold under light irradiation. This superior conversion of CO resulted from the fact that CO could serve as an effective quencher of reactive species along with the photoelectron production. In addition, CO was used as a carbon source either directly or indirectly via the produced CO2 for M. barkeri. Such a process improved the redox activities of membrane-bound proteins for BPEC methanogenesis. These results were consistent with the transcriptomic analyses, in which the genes for the putative CO oxidation and CO2 reduction pathways in M. barkeri were highly expressed, while the gene expression for reactive oxygen species detoxification remained relatively stable under light irradiation. This study has provided the first proof-of-concept evidence for sustainable CO methanation under a mild condition in the self-replicating BPEC system.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c08340.Image of the BPEC reactor setup (Figure S1); CH4 yield of BPEC-CO (dark) and M. barkeri-CO (dark) (Figure S2); NADH/NAD ratio in the BPEC-CO under visible light irradiation and dark condition (Figure S3); XRD spectra of the BPEC-CO system before and after the reaction (Figure S4); CH4 production of BPEC-CO in five cycles (Figure S5); gas sensing response of the biohybrid catalyst under light irradiation (Figure S6); I–t curves with a light on/off cycle (45/45 s) with BPEC-CO and BPEC-CO2 systems (Figure S7); isosurfaces of differential charge density of CO and CO2 molecules adsorbed on the CdS (101) surface (yellow, charge accumulation; blue, charge depletion; value of isosurface = 0.0004 e/Å3) (Figure S8); LIVE/DEAD BacLight viability staining of M. barkeri-CO (dark), BPEC-CO after the light irradiation, and live/dead cell ratio and total cell concentration evaluated with ImageJ software (Figure S9); relative rate of different components in total fluorescence intensity of EPS extracted from both BPEC systems (Figure S10); concentration of membrane-bound proteins in both BPEC systems (Figure S11); composition of the sterilized heterotrophic medium (SHM) and sterilized autotrophic medium (SAM) (Table S1); gene expression (log2 FPKM) under different conditions (Table S2); and CO conversion in BPEC systems (Table S3) (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?