Abstract:Executing an important decision can be as easy as moving a mouse cursor or reaching towards the preferred option with a hand. But would we decide differently if choosing required walking a few steps towards an option? More generally, is our preference invariant to the means and motor costs of reporting it? Previous research demonstrated that asymmetric motor costs can nudge the decision-maker towards a less costly option. However, virtually all traditional decision-making theories predict that increasing motor costs symmetrically for all options should not affect choice in any way. This prediction is disputed by the theory of embodied cognition, which suggests that motor behavior is an integral part of cognitive processes, and that motor costs can affect our choices. In this registered report, we investigated whether varying motor costs can affect response dynamics and the final choices in an intertemporal choice task: choosing between a readily available small reward and a larger but delayed reward. Our study compared choices reported by moving a computer mouse cursor towards the preferred option with the choices executed via a more motor costly walking procedure. First, we investigated whether relative values of the intertemporal choice options affect walking trajectories in the same way as they affect mouse cursor dynamics. Second, we tested a hypothesis that, in the walking condition, increased motor costs of a preference reversal would decrease the number of changes-of-mind and therefore increase the proportion of impulsive, smaller-but-sooner choices. We confirmed the hypothesis that walking trajectories reflect covert dynamics of decision making, and rejected the hypothesis that increased motor costs of responding affect decisions in an intertemporal choice task. Overall, this study contributes to the empirical basis enabling the decision-making theories to address the complex interplay between cognitive and motor processes.

Poor efficacy of amphotericin B‐based therapy in CNS aspergillosis

Biomechanical Costs Influence Decisions Made During Ongoing Actions

The expression of decision and learning variables in movement patterns related to decision actions

Reinforcement Learning Control of a Biomechanical Model of the Upper Extremity

Learning to Move and Plan like the Knight: Sequential Decision Making with a Novel Motor Mapping

Learning and embodied decisions in active inference

Rapid, systematic updating of movement by accumulated decision evidence

An Optimization-Based Model for Full-body Reaching Movements

On the nature of motor planning variables during arm pointing movement: Compositeness and speed dependence

A novel biomechanical model of the mouse forelimb predicts muscle activity in optimal control simulations of reaching movements

Theoretical limits on the speed of learning inverse models explain the rate of adaptation in arm reaching tasks

Exploration-based learning of a stabilizing controller predicts locomotor adaptation

Motor Performance, Mental Workload and Self-Efficacy Dynamics during Learning of Reaching Movements throughout Multiple Practice Sessions

Neuro-musculoskeletal modeling reveals muscle-level neural dynamics of adaptive learning in sensorimotor cortex

Beyond reach: Do symmetric changes in motor costs affect decision making? A registered report

Learning Predictive Models for Ergonomic Control of Prosthetic Devices

eta(1)-N-succinimidato complexes of iron, molybdenum and tungsten as reversible inhibitors of papain.

Proximodistal Exploration in Motor Learning as an Emergent Property of Optimization

"Leap before you look": Conditions that suppress explicit, knowledge-based learning during visuomotor adaptation.