A multi-centre retrospective study of rituximab use in the treatment of relapsed or resistant warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia

Su W Maung,Maeve Leahy,Hilary M O'Leary,Irfan Khan,Mary R Cahill,Oonagh Gilligan,Philip Murphy,Suzanne McPherson,Fred Jackson,Mary Ryan,Brian Hennessy,Johnny McHugh,Matthew Goodyer,Larry Bacon,Peter O'Gorman,Aisling Nee,Michael O'Dwyer,Helen Enright,Jean Saunders,Denis O'Keeffe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12486
Abstract:This retrospective analysis assessed the response, safety and duration of response to standard dose rituximab 375 mg/m(2) weekly for four weeks as therapy for patients with primary or secondary warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (WAIHA), who had failed initial treatment. Thirty-four patients received rituximab for WAIHA in seven centres in the Republic of Ireland. The overall response rate was 70·6% (24/34) with 26·5% (9/34) achieving a complete response (CR). The time to response was 1 month post-initiation of rituximab in 87·5% (21/24) and 3 months in 12·5% (3/24) of patients. The median duration of follow-up was 36 months (range 6-90 months). Of the patients who responded, 50% (12/24) relapsed during follow up with a median time to next treatment of 16·5 months (range 6-60 months). Three patients were re-treated with rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for four weeks at relapse and responded. There was a single episode of neutropenic sepsis. Rituximab is an effective and safe treatment for WAIHA but a significant number of patients will relapse in the first two years post treatment. Re-treatment was effective in a small number of patients, suggesting that intermittent pulse treatment or maintenance treatment may improve long-term response.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?