Applying spending review theory to developing countries: The case of South Africa

Tania Ajam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835x.2024.2333386

2024-04-11

Development Southern Africa

Abstract:The seminal spending review (SR) theoretical framework by Catalano & Erbacci [2018. A theoretical framework for spending review policies at a time of widespread recession. OECD Journal on Budgeting 17(2), 9–24] draws on the cutback management and related academic literature to articulate the first theory for explaining the ability of medium-term SRs conducted after the global financial crisis of 2008 to effect targeted savings. This literature is however dominated by advanced economies with sophisticated public financial management systems. Comparatively little attention, however, has been paid to theoretical perspectives on developing countries, like South Africa. This article applies this theoretical framework by Catalano and Erbacci to the South African SR initiative in order to interrogate its theoretical and empirical relevance. Proposals are made for enhancing the operationalisation of the organisational and process dimensions of C&E's theoretical framework to lay a foundation for future empirical research and its policy implications for South Africans SRs are explored.

development studies

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the application of Spending Review (SR) theory in the context of developing countries, with a particular focus on South Africa.

The core issue of the paper is to understand and develop a theoretical framework for spending review that is applicable to developing countries, and to explore its specific application in South Africa. The author points out that current research on spending review mostly focuses on developed countries with mature public financial management systems, while there is less attention on developing countries. Therefore, the paper attempts to apply the spending review theoretical framework proposed by Catalano and Erbacci to the South African case to test the applicability and effectiveness of this framework.

The paper first introduces the basic concepts of spending review and its practice in different countries, particularly noting that South Africa is one of the few developing countries that have implemented spending review at the institutional level. Subsequently, the paper analyzes the theoretical framework proposed by Catalano and Erbacci, which suggests that factors such as political support, social legitimacy, organizational phenomena, and internal constraints affect the effectiveness of spending review, and introduces time as a dynamic factor influencing these elements.

The paper then discusses the importance of theoretical construction in the discipline of public financial management and emphasizes the importance of establishing public financial management norms based on theory and empirical evidence. Additionally, the paper explores how to operationalize Catalano and Erbacci's theoretical framework in the specific context of South Africa, including the concretization of various dimensions within the theoretical framework.

In summary, the main issues the paper attempts to address are:
1. How to apply the existing spending review theoretical framework to developing countries, especially in the context of South Africa;
2. Exploring how to improve and develop spending review practices suitable for developing countries through theoretical construction;
3. Analyzing the challenges and possible solutions in implementing spending review in South Africa.