Long‐term Outcomes of Surgical Approaches for Bilateral Hepatolithiasis: A Real‐world Six‐decade Experience at a Single Center
Jie Zhang,Zhi Xu,Lixin Wang,Chunsheng Hou,Gang Wang,Long Cui,Lingfu Zhang,Xiaofeng Ling,Dianrong Xiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1204
2022-01-01
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
Abstract:Background Bilateral hepatolithiasis is an intractable disease and repeated attacks of acute cholangitis seriously threaten patient health. The surgical approaches evolve along with gradually greater understanding of its pathophysiology. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study for bilateral hepatolithiasis from January 1958 to December 2018. Before May 1993 (Group A, n = 70), three surgical approaches were adopted: 37 patients with common bile duct exploration (CBDE), 29 with choledochoenterostomy (CE) and four with partial hepatectomy (PH). After June 1993 (Group B, n = 150), 101 patients underwent Oddi sphincter-preserved cholangioplasty with hepatico-subcutaneous stoma (OSPCHS), and 16 with CBDE, 21 with CE, 12 with PH. The perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared. Results After 1993, the cholangitis recurrence rate significantly decreased from 49.2% to 20.9%, and the stone recurrence rate from 76.3% to 37.1% (both P < .001). Also, the stone-/cholangitis-free durations were prolonged significantly (median: 50.8 vs 26.4/49.6 vs 16.2 months, both P < .001). Preoperative cholangitis was an independent risk factor for stone recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.863, P = .018), and residual stone for cholangitis recurrence (HR = 2.838, P < .001). OSPCHS and PH were protective surgical approaches for recurrent stone (CBDE: reference; OSPCHS: HR = .469, P = .016, PH: HR = .219, P = .018) and cholangitis (CBDE: reference; OSPCHS: HR = .421, P = .010, PH: HR = .283, P = .093). Conclusions For bilateral hepatolithiasis, the management should focus on hepatobiliary lesion eradication and Oddi sphincter function preservation.