Abstract:Parents and family carers of children with complex needs experience a high level of pressure to meet children's needs while maintaining family functioning and, as a consequence, often experience reduced well‐being and elevated psychological distress. Peer support interventions are intended to improve parent and carer well‐being by enhancing the social support available to them. Support may be delivered via peer mentoring or through support groups (peer or facilitator led). Peer support interventions are widely available, but the potential benefits and risks of such interventions are not well established. To assess the effects of peer support interventions (compared to usual care or alternate interventions) on psychological and psychosocial outcomes, including adverse outcomes, for parents and other family carers of children with complex needs in any setting. We searched the following resources. • Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; latest issue: April 2014), in the Cochrane Library. • MEDLINE (OvidSP) (1966 to 19 March 2014). • Embase (OvidSP) (1974 to 18 March 2014). • (22 April 2014). • PsycINFO (OvidSP) (1887 to 19 March 2014). • BiblioMap (EPPI‐Centre, Health Promotion Research database) (22 April 2014). • ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (26 May 2014). • metaRegister of Controlled Trials (13 May 2014). We conducted a search update of the following databases. • MEDLINE (OvidSP) (2013 to 20 February 2018) (search overlapped to 2013). • PsycINFO (ProQuest) (2013 to 20 February 2018). • Embase (Elsevier) (2013 to 21 February 2018). We handsearched the reference lists of included studies and four key journals ( European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry : 31 March 2015; Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders : 30 March 2015; Diabetes Educator : 7 April 2015; Journal of Intellectual Disability Research : 13 April 2015). We contacted key investigators and consulted key advocacy groups for advice on identifying unpublished data. We ran updated searches on 14 August 2019 and on 25 May 2021. Studies identified in these searches as eligible for full‐text review are listed as "Studies awaiting classification" and will be assessed in a future update. Randomised and cluster randomised controlled trials (RCTs and cluster RCTs) and quasi‐RCTs were eligible for inclusion. Controlled before‐and‐after and interrupted time series studies were eligible for inclusion if they met criteria set by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. The comparator could be usual care or an alternative intervention. The population eligible for inclusion consisted of parents and other family carers of children with any complex needs. We applied no restriction on setting. Inclusion decisions were made independently by two authors, with differences resolved by a third author. Extraction to data extraction templates was conducted independently by two authors and cross‐checked. Risk of bias assessments were made independently by two authors and were reported according to Cochrane guidelines. All measures of treatment effect were continuous and were analysed in Review Manager version 5.3. GRADE assessments were undertaken independently by two review authors, with differences resolved by discussion. We included 22 studies (21 RCTs, 1 quasi‐RCT) of 2404 participants. Sixteen studies compared peer support to usual care; three studies compared peer support to an alternative intervention and to usual care but only data from the usual care arm contributed to results; and three studies compared peer support to an alternative intervention only. We judged risk of bias as moderate to high across all studies, particularly for selection, performance, and detection bias. Included studies contributed data to seven effect estimates compared to usual care: psychological distress (standardised mean difference (SMD) ‐0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) ‐0.32 to 0.11; 8 studies, 864 participants), confidence and self‐efficacy (SMD 0.04, 95% CI ‐0.14 to 0.21; 8 studies, 542 participants), perception of coping (SMD ‐0.08, 95% CI ‐0.38 to 0.21; 3 studies, 293 participants), quality of life and life satisfaction (SMD 0.03, 95% CI ‐0.32 to 0.38; 2 studies, 143 participants), family functioning (SMD 0.15, 95% CI ‐0.09 to 0.38; 4 studies, 272 participants), perceived social support (SMD 0.31, 95% CI ‐0.15 to 0.77; 4 studies, 191 participants), and confidence and skill in navigating medical services (SMD 0.05, 95% CI ‐0.17 to 0.28; 4 studies, 304 participants). In comparisons to alternative interventions, one pooled effect estimate was possible: psychological distress (SMD 0.2, 95% CI ‐0.38 to 0.79; 2 studies, 95 participants). No studies reported on adverse outcomes. All narratively synthesised data for psychological distress (compared to usual care ‐ 2 studies), family functioning (compared to usual care ‐ 1 study; compared to an -Abstract Truncated-

Australian consumer perceptions of peer support

Workplace experiences of mental health consumer peer workers in New South Wales, Australia: a survey study exploring job satisfaction, burnout and turnover intention

"I Think Peer Support Helps to Demystify People Who Have Mental Health Issues and Helps to Remove That Stigma": Exploring the Defining Characteristics and Related Challenges of Youth Peer Support Through Participatory Research

Consumers lived experiences and satisfaction with sub-acute mental health residential services

The Effects of Australia's First Residential Peer-Support Suicide Prevention and Recovery Centre (SPARC)

"Do I feel safe here?" Organisational climate and mental health peer worker experience

Peer support for eating disorders in Canada: program user perspectives

The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review

The Choice Project: Peer Workers Promoting Shared Decision Making at a Youth Mental Health Service

Evaluation of lived experience Peer Support intervention for mental health service consumers in Primary Care (PS-PC): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial

"A little bit of hope goes a long way": Exploring the role of peer workers in alcohol and other drug rehabilitation services

Exploring long‐term outcomes of a peer support programme for parents* of children with disability in Australia

Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs.

Implementing peer support into practice in mental health services: a qualitative comparative case study

Talking About Things Important to Me: Mental Health Consumers' Experiences of Consumer‐Rated Measures

“You can create a little bit more closure in your own story when someone really connects with it”: exploring how involvement in youth peer support work can promote peer development

Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program

'Nothing About Us Without Us': exploring benefits and challenges of peer support for people with disability in peer support organisations - protocol paper for a qualitative coproduction project

A Qualitative Exploration of Peer Supporters' Experiences of Undertaking a Co‐Produced Mental Health and Emotional Well‐Being Training Programme

Two approaches, one goal: How mental health registered nurses' perceive their role and the role of peer support workers in facilitating consumer decision-making

'Been there, experienced that': A qualitative study on the experiences and perceptions of online peer volunteers in supporting Singaporean mothers at risk of depression