The impact of visit‐to‐visit heart rate variability on all‐cause mortality in atrial fibrillation

Xiaoyan Zhou,Qinghua Yuan,Jie Yuan,Zhi‐Min Du,Xiaodong Zhuang,Xinxue Liao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.13094
IF: 1.485
2024-01-17
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
Abstract:3983 participants from the AFFIRM study were followed for an average of 3.5 years, and 621 participants died from all causes. The lowest and highest quartiles of HRSD independently predicted an increased risk of all‐cause mortality compared to the other two, presenting a U‐shaped relationship. Objective We aimed to investigate the association between visit‐to‐visit heart rate variability (VVHRV) and all‐cause mortality in patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF). Previous studies have shown a positive correlation between VVHRV and several adverse outcomes. However, the relationship between VVHRV and the prognosis of AF remains uncertain. Methods In our study, we aimed to examine the relationship between VVHRV and mortality rates among 3983 participants with AF, who were part of the AFFIRM study (Atrial Fibrillation Follow‐Up Investigation of Rhythm Management). We used the standard deviation of heart rate (HRSD) to measure VVHRV and divided the patients into four groups based on quartiles of HRSD (1st, <5.69; 2nd, 5.69–8.00; 3rd, 8.01–11.01; and 4th, ≥11.02). Our primary endpoint was all‐cause death, and we estimated the hazard ratios for mortality using the Cox proportional hazard regressions. Results Our analysis included 3983 participants from the AFFIRM study and followed for an average of 3.5 years. During this period, 621 participants died from all causes. In multiple‐adjustment models, we found that the lowest and highest quartiles of HRSD independently predicted an increased risk of all‐cause mortality compared to the other two quartiles, presenting a U‐shaped relationship (1st vs 2nd, hazard ratio = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.63–3.20, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?