Abstract:Prediction of carbon (C) sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems under climate change depends on C‐nitrogen (N) interactions. While many newly developed C‐N coupling models predict lower C storage than their C‐only counterpart models, it has not been carefully examined whether or not such model predictions would be supported by real‐world observations. This study is to retrieve knowledge on N cycle from one field warming experiment in an alpine meadow of China so that we can better predict land C sequestration. We estimated two sets of parameters with one C‐only model and one C‐N coupling model, respectively, with the data assimilation technique. Our results showed that estimated process rates (e.g., senescence and decomposition rates) of organic C from almost all pools except standing litter and leaf are higher with the C‐N coupling model than those with the C‐only model. The allocation coefficient of C to root estimated with the C‐only model was 68.0% and 56.6% smaller than that with the C‐N coupling model under the ambient and warming treatments, respectively. Both the C‐only and C‐N coupling models simulate similar C pool sizes as observed at either the ambient or warming treatment with their respective parameter estimates. Meanwhile, the warming treatment increased the slow soil organic matter (SOM) pool due to decrease in estimated decomposition rate of the slow SOM via parameter fitting and increase in the C input from surface litter. In general, our results suggest that reparameterization is required when we add N processes to a C cycle model to realistically predict the ecosystem dynamics in response to future changes in N availability. Models with nitrogen (N) module usually predict lower carbon (C) storage than their C‐only counterpart models, but the C storage in the real‐world ecosystems won't change according to whether or not a model considers N processes. We estimated two sets of parameters with one C‐only model and one C‐N coupling model, respectively, from a field warming experiment in an alpine meadow of China with the data assimilation technique. The technique integrates observations with model via parameter estimation. We found that a model structure change from the C‐only to C‐N coupling influences model parameterization but doesn't influence the simulations. However, warming increased soil C storage due to the larger C input and the smaller decomposition rate than the control. We suggest when we add N processes to a C cycle model, the new models should be re‐parameterized, ideally with data assimilation, to better predict the ecosystem C dynamics under chaing N availability. Model structure changes from carbon only to carbon‐nitrogen coupling often result in lowered ecosystem carbon storage and lowered carbon sequestration, which may not reflect the reality in the real‐world ecosystems Our study with data assimilation suggested that parameter values change with model structures whereas simulated ecosystem carbon dynamics are similar under either ambient and warning conditions Nitrogen (with other elements as well) regulates carbon cycle processes mainly through its influences on parameters in this study Model structure changes from carbon only to carbon‐nitrogen coupling often result in lowered ecosystem carbon storage and lowered carbon sequestration, which may not reflect the reality in the real‐world ecosystems Our study with data assimilation suggested that parameter values change with model structures whereas simulated ecosystem carbon dynamics are similar under either ambient and warning conditions Nitrogen (with other elements as well) regulates carbon cycle processes mainly through its influences on parameters in this study

Global patterns of nitrogen limitation: confronting two global biogeochemical models with observations

Linkages of plant stoichiometry to ecosystem production and carbon fluxes with increasing nitrogen inputs in an alpine steppe

Ecosystem C and N cycle interactions – diverse model representations and divergent model predictions versus collective empirical constraints

Feedback of carbon and nitrogen cycles enhances carbon sequestration in the terrestrial biosphere

Evaluating nitrogen cycling in terrestrial biosphere models: a disconnect between the carbon and nitrogen cycles

Global evaluation of the nutrient enabled version of land surface model ORCHIDEE-CNP (v1.2)

Can models adequately reflect how long-term nitrogen enrichment alters the forest soil carbon cycle?

Asymmetric response of ecosystem carbon components and soil water consumption to nitrogen fertilization in farmland

GOLUM-CNP V1.0: a Data-Driven Modeling of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles in Major Terrestrial Biomes

Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon-nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies

GOLUM-CNP v 1 . 0 : a data-driven modeling of carbon , nitrogen and 1 phosphorus cycles in major terrestrial biomes 2

Dominant role of nitrogen stoichiometric flexibility in ecosystem carbon storage under elevated CO2

The Effects of Nitrogen Enrichment on Soil CO2 Fluxes Depending on Temperature and Soil Properties

Simulating Global Terrestrial Carbon and Nitrogen Biogeochemical Cycles With Implicit and Explicit Representations of Soil Microbial Activity

Empirical evidence and theoretical understanding of ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycle interactions

Plant responses to elevated CO2 under competing hypotheses of nitrogen and phosphorus limitations

Insights on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Co‐Limitation in Global Croplands from Theoretical and Modeling Fertilization Experiments

Reparameterization Required After Model Structure Changes From Carbon Only to Carbon‐Nitrogen Coupling

Global pattern and controls of biological nitrogen fixation under nutrient enrichment: A meta-analysis

Carbon-Nitrogen Coupling Under Three Schemes Of Model Representation: A Traceability Analysis

N and P constrain C in ecosystems under climate change: Role of nutrient redistribution, accumulation, and stoichiometry