Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) and especially reinforcement learning (RL) have the potential to enable agents to learn and perform tasks autonomously with superhuman performance. However, we consider RL as fundamentally a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) paradigm, even when an agent eventually performs its task autonomously. In cases where the reward function is challenging or impossible to define, HITL approaches are considered particularly advantageous. The application of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in systems such as ChatGPT demonstrates the effectiveness of optimizing for user experience and integrating their feedback into the training loop. In HITL RL, human input is integrated during the agent's learning process, allowing iterative updates and fine-tuning based on human feedback, thus enhancing the agent's performance. Since the human is an essential part of this process, we argue that human-centric approaches are the key to successful RL, a fact that has not been adequately considered in the existing literature. This paper aims to inform readers about current explainability methods in HITL RL. It also shows how the application of explainable AI (xAI) and specific improvements to existing explainability approaches can enable a better human-agent interaction in HITL RL for all types of users, whether for lay people, domain experts, or machine learning specialists. Accounting for the workflow in HITL RL and based on software and machine learning methodologies, this article identifies four phases for human involvement for creating HITL RL systems: (1) Agent Development, (2) Agent Learning, (3) Agent Evaluation, and (4) Agent Deployment. We highlight human involvement, explanation requirements, new challenges, and goals for each phase. We furthermore identify low-risk, high-return opportunities for explainability research in HITL RL and present long-term research goals to advance the field. Finally, we propose a vision of human-robot collaboration that allows both parties to reach their full potential and cooperate effectively.

A Definition and a Test for Human-Level Artificial Intelligence

Toward Human-Level Artificial Intelligence

A design of human-like robust AI machines in object identification

Formal Definition of AI

On a Functional Definition of Intelligence

Defining intelligence: Bridging the gap between human and artificial perspectives

Human $\neq$ AGI

The Computational Principles of Learning Ability

Abstraction and Analogy-Making in Artificial Intelligence

Bridging the Gap between Artificial Intelligence and Artificial General Intelligence: A Ten Commandment Framework for Human-Like Intelligence

Can Machines Imitate Humans? Integrative Turing Tests for Vision and Language Demonstrate a Narrowing Gap

Giving the AI definition a form suitable for the engineer

On the Measure of Intelligence

Is Intelligence Artificial?

Not Cheating on the Turing Test: Towards Grounded Language Learning in Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) is an Academic Handicap for the Learners (challenge of a new era)

Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learning: A Survey and Position on Requirements, Challenges, and Opportunities

A Review on Objective-Driven Artificial Intelligence

The AI Definition and a Program Which Satisfies this Definition

A Scholarly Definition of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Advancing AI as a Conceptual Framework in Communication Research