Chatting with the King about cancer

Richard Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q342
2024-02-09
BMJ
Abstract:King: Good morning. This King Charles. I'm sorry to ring so early, and I'm sure that you're surprised to hear from me. You'll know probably that I've had cancer diagnosed, and by a strange coincidence while I was waiting in the hospital an aide brought to my attention the blog you posted yesterday about the meaning of cancer.1 As you may guess, I'm a man who likes to think about the big picture of everything, including cancer. That's why I'm ringing you.Richard: I'm honoured. The first thing I need to say is that I'm sorry that you've had cancer diagnosed. It's always a shock no matter how much you might be expecting it. The second thing I must say is that my blog was based on a book Making Sense of Cancer: From Its Evolutionary Origin to Its Societal Impact and the Ultimate Solution by Jarle Breivik, a cancer researcher...
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper is actually an article about the conversation between King Charles III of the United Kingdom and Richard Smith, the president of the Health Alliance, rather than a scientific research paper in the traditional sense. Therefore, it does not attempt to solve a specific technical or scientific problem, but explores some philosophical and social aspects of cancer. Specifically, the article attempts to address the following issues: 1. **Social perception of cancer**: Through King Charles III's personal experience, the article explores the public's perception of cancer and its impact. In particular, how the king's decision to publicly announce that he has cancer affects the public's view of cancer. 2. **Multifaceted nature of cancer**: The article emphasizes that cancer is not a single disease, but a variety of different types of diseases, each with different prognoses and treatment methods. The author criticizes the king for not disclosing the specific type of cancer, believing that this will exacerbate the public's misunderstanding of the singularity of cancer. 3. **Treatment decisions**: The article discusses the factors that cancer patients should consider when facing treatment options, especially the trade - off between quality of life and survival time. The author suggests that patients should not rush to make a decision, but should take the time to communicate with doctors and patients with similar experiences to make the choice that suits them best. 4. **The relationship between cancer and the environment**: The article also explores the impact of cancer treatment on the environment. With the progress of cancer treatment technology, more and more expensive drugs are used to prolong patients' lives, but the production and use of these drugs have a negative impact on the environment. In addition, globally, people in many regions cannot obtain basic cancer treatment, which has led to thinking about the uneven distribution of medical resources. In summary, this article mainly focuses on the social perception of cancer, treatment decisions, and its impact on the environment, aiming to explore the cancer problem from a broader perspective.