Sleep disturbance in patients with advanced cancer: Frequency and factors associated with response to specialist-based outpatient supportive care.
S. Yennurajalingam,G. Chisholm,S. Palla,E. Bruera
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.29.15_SUPPL.9069
IF: 45.3
2011-05-20
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:9069 Background: Sleep disturbance (SD) is one of the most distressing symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. There is limited data on the effectiveness of treatment and predictors of response.
METHODS
We reviewed 442 consecutive patients with advanced cancer presenting in the Supportive care clinic for SD. All patients underwent screening for SD ('+' defined as ≥3/10) and interdisciplinary assessment and treatment including drug review, counseling, sleep hygiene, and drug therapy (PC). Response was defined as ≥30% improvement from baseline to follow up visit. Baseline patient characteristics, cancer related symptoms (Edmonton symptom assessment scale), delirium (Memorial delirium assessment scale), use of opioids, steroids and anxiolytics/hypnotics, and CAGE score, were analyzed to determine their association with response to PC.
RESULTS
The median age was 58 years; males were 53%. The most common cancer types were H&N and lung and GI. (55%). 330/ 442 pts had SD (75 %). Median, mean (SDev) for SD (0=best sleep, 10- worst sleep imaginable) were 5 and 5(3). Sedative use (r-0.16, p=0.002), pain (r - 0.31), fatigue (r-0.31, <0.001), Depression(r-0.25, p<0.001), anxiety (r-0.28, p<0.001), drowsiness (r-0.30, p<0.001) and feeling of wellbeing (r-0.33, p=0.02) are associated with SD at initial consult. The median time between visits was 15 days. SD response was seen in 143/330 (43%) [95% CI 38% to 49%]. Use of medications such as anxiolytics/hypnotics, steroids, opioid dose, pain, depression, anxiety, fatigue and delirium were not predictive of SD response. Higher SD score (OR=1.14 per pt; p=0.01) was associated with response in patients with baseline SD.
CONCLUSIONS
Frequency and severity of SD is high. Response to interdisciplinary supportive care is low. Further research is greatly needed.