Abstract:The tragedy of the commons refers to the overuse of resources which are rival in consumption but lack excludability and it also refers to rent dissipation. While the tragedy of the anticommons is a tragedy closely connected with underuse of resources that are rival in consumption and with too strong excludability. The prior studies proved that the tragedy of the commons and the tragedy of the anticommons are symmetric from the perspective of pure mathematics, especially the game theory, which was later refuted by behavioral economics experiments. According to them, the tragedy of the anticommons is severer than the tragedy of the commons. The asymmetry of the tragedy of the commons and the tragedy of the anticommons is a paradox by these different research methods. This paradox shows that there are imperfections in the completely rational economic man hypothesis set up by neoclassical economics. As a fundamental theory, the tragedy of the commons is quite influential in many disciplines, such as microeconomics, public sector economics, ecological economics, environmental economics, management, sociology, property law, and political science. And the tragedy of the anticommons theory has also opened its door of both theoretical research and practical implications since its acceptance by Nobel laureate Buchanan, the main founder of public choice school. Only when theoretical issues are thoroughly discussed and made clear enough, can people avoid misunderstanding or misusing the commons theory. Thus, it is necessary to elucidate the paradox between them. Based on Simon's bounded rationality, Kahneman and Tversky's prospect theory, value function, Thaler's mental accounting, endowment effect, and other cognitive psychological tools, this study clearly shows that agents' decision-making process is not just based on the long-believed marginal benefit and marginal cost analysis advocated by traditional neoclassical economists. Agents' decision-making is a process in which agents selectively absorb, code the objective marginal revenue and marginal cost, and feed relevant information to their brain. Therefore, what plays a directly decisive role is not the objective marginal revenue and marginal cost per se , but the mentally perceived subjective utility of marginal revenue and marginal cost by the human brain. Followed by this research clue, the paradox between the tragedy of the commons and the tragedy of the anticommons is elucidated from the perspective of cognitive psychology.

The Common Structure of Paradoxes in Aggregation Theory

Resolving Bertrand's Probability Paradox

A Study of the Paradoxes in Decision-making Logic

On Semantic Paradoxes from the Perspective of Substructural Logics

Higher-Level Paradoxes and Substructural Solutions

Aggregating individual credences into collective binary beliefs: an impossibility result

From Condorcet's paradox to Arrow: yet another simple proof of the impossibility theorem

A Study of Voting Paradox

The Language Structure of Paradox:Recursive Negation

Understanding the paradox between tragedies of the commons and the anticommons: From a cognitive psychology perspective

Arrow, Hausdorff, and Ambiguities in the Choice of Preferred States in Complex Systems

Meaningful Causal Aggregation and Paradoxical Confounding

Sometime a Paradox, Now Proof: Non-First-Order-izability of Yablo's Paradox

Egalitarian Judgment Aggregation

Wittgenstein, Peirce, and paradoxes of mathematical proof

From Lawvere to Brandenburger-Keisler: interactive forms of diagonalization and self-reference

Aggregating Credences into Beliefs: Agenda Conditions for Impossibility Results

Complexity of Judgment Aggregation

Entropic Inference: some pitfalls and paradoxes we can avoid

Empirical and computational approaches to collective choice: introduction to a special issue

Paradox, dialectics or trade‐offs? A double loop model of paradox