Low-quality evidence suggests a strong association between depth of curve of Spee and dentoskeletal characteristics
Yasmin Mohamed,Ryan Prevost,Thikriat Al-Jewair,Lauren Katz McKay
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.102007
IF: 5.1
2024-06-02
Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice
Abstract:SUMMARY Selection Criteria This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses statement, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, LILACS and BBO (via Virtual Health Library), OpenGrey, and Google Scholar were searched up to September 2021. Inclusion of studies was determined by the PECOS (Population, Exposure, Comparison, Outcome, and Study Design) criteria with no restrictions on year of publication or language. Unpublished manuscripts and conference abstracts were also considered in the review if they met the eligibility criteria, and included in the quantitative synthesis if they reported numerical results for the depth of COS. Two reviewers independently assessed the titles and abstracts of identified articles and a third reviewer was consulted in cases of disagreement. A total of 700 studies were initially screened and the reference lists of these studies were manually searched and identified 45 additional relevant studies. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria at the different review stages, a total of 35 studies were included in the qualitative review and 29 of them were included in the quantitative synthesis. Key study factors Most of the included studies were cross-sectional, seven were retrospective evaluations with different follow-up time points, and two were self-reported as case-control studies although not following a traditional design. Seven studies indicated studying participants over 18 years old, two studies did not mention the age of the sample and the rest of the studies included participants with complete permanent dentition up to second molars. For the dentoskeletal assessment, all studies evaluated the COS according to the Angle's molar classification. In addition, three studies assessed vertical dental deviations (deep overbite and anterior open bite). Five studies assessed the sagittal skeletal pattern and nine evaluated the vertical skeletal patterns. The risk of bias was assessed using the Fowkes and Fulton guidelines. Meta-analyses reported summary statistics and effect sizes on Forest Plot graphs. The certainty of evidence in each study was assessed using the GRADEpro (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) Guideline Development Tool. Main Outcome Measures The depth of COS was measured directly on dental casts or using photographs of casts. The measurements were conducted using multiple methods including a computer- assisted stereotaxic device and vertical push dial indicator. When studies reported COS depths of both right and left sides and there was no significant difference between them, right side values were selected. Main Results Four meta-analyses were performed to compare COS depths for subjects with dental Class II malocclusion (without subclassifications), Class II division 1, Class II division 2, and Class II subdivision compared to Class I malocclusion. The summary effects showed that subjects with dental Class II, Class II division 1, and Class II subdivision had a higher COS depth than those with Class I malocclusion. In addition, two meta-analyses compared dental Class III and Class I malocclusions and those with deep overbite versus normal overbite. They found a flatter COS in dental Class III malocclusion compared to Class I. Also, subjects with increased overbite had a deeper COS than those with a normal overbite. According to two meta-analyses that evaluated the depth of COS in skeletal Class II and Class III subjects compared to Class I subjects, subjects with Class II had deeper COS than those with Class I, whereas skeletal Class III showed no significant difference when compared to Class I. In terms of vertical skeletal pattern, the results of two meta-analyses showed that hypodivergent individuals presented with deeper COS than normodivergent counterparts. Also, there was no significant difference in COS depth between hyperdivergent and normodivergent individuals. Nineteen studies were of high risk of bias and the rest were of moderate risk. There was very low certainty of evidence due to the risk of bias, the presence of inconsistency, and the limited amount of data included in the analyses. Conclusion Subjects with Class II dentoskeletal patterns showed deeper COS while those with Class III patterns showed flatter COS than Class I subjects. Subjects presenting with a deep overbite or hypodivergent skeletal pattern had deeper COS than those with normal overbite or normodivergent skeletal pat -Abstract Truncated-
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine