(081) External Scattered Radiation From Prostate Carcinoma Therapy Affects Both Germ And Somatic Human Testicular Cells

A Caldeira- Brant,R Martello,L Campos,AB Reis,ET Samesima,FM Reis,KE Orwig,H Chiarini-Garcia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae167.079
2024-12-12
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Abstract:Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) is the leading cancer type among men. While external radiation therapy (RT) is commonly utilized and successful in eradicating prostate cancer cells, its scattered radiation can potentially harm male fertility. There is limited understanding of how scattered radiation from RT impacts both germ and somatic cells in the testis of men with prostate cancer. Objective This study aims to evaluate the germ and Sertoli cells of adult men diagnosed with PC and who underwent RT. Methods Five men, aged between 60 and 78, who were fertile and diagnosed with prostate cancer (PC), underwent total external radiation therapy with doses ranging from 64 to 72 Gy for 32 to 40 days. They were later castrated between 15 and 24 months after treatment due to cancer recurrence. Additionally, testes were collected from five other patients, aged between 48 and 62, with advanced PC who had not undergone any prior treatment before castration, serving as the control group (NoT). Analysis of sex hormone levels, along with histological and immunohistochemistry (IHC) examinations, was conducted. Results Despite similar testosterone serum levels, FSH and LH were augmented in the RT group (Fig. 1). While 100% of NoT seminiferous tubules presented VASA+ germ cells, only 9% of RT tubules had them, with 70% and 21% showing Sertoli cell (SOX9+) only and fibrotic phenotypes, respectively (Fig. 2). Regarding germ cells, types Adark, Apale and B spermatogonia, and preleptotene spermatocytes were lower in RT (Fig. 3A), which was confirmed by MAGEA-4 spermatogonial immunostaining (Fig. 3B). In terms of undifferentiated spermatogonia, despite being reduced in the RT group (Fig. 4A), UTF1+ cells presented higher mitotic activity after IHC for MCM7 (Fig. 4B). 85% of MAGEA-4+ spermatogonia were undergoing apoptosis (CASPASE3+) in RT patients, whereas only 1% were found in NoT (Fig. 5). Concerning SOX9+ Sertoli cells, their number was not only lower in the RT group (Fig. 6A), but also showed increased apoptosis (Fig. 6B) and proliferation (Fig. 6C). Claudin-11 immunostaining revealed the presence of a blood-testis barrier protein in RT Sertoli cells, despite being more evenly organized in NoT patients (Fig. 7). Υ-H2AX immunostaining revealed DNA damage in both somatic and germ cells of RT patients. Conclusions The scattered radiation from radiation therapy disrupts the process of spermatogenesis in adult men by impacting both germ and Sertoli cells. Additionally, these cells notably decreased in RT patients compared to NoT patients. Surprisingly, it was also observed that Sertolli cell proliferation and apoptosis, as well as DNA damage, occurred even 2 years post-irradiation. In addition, the blood-testis barrier was severely affected in post-irradiation patients. Future studies should be conducted to investigate Sertolli's cell proliferation. Disclosure No.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?