Abstract:Statement of problem The use of a scannable healing abutment is a convenient option for fabricating implant-supported restorations (ISRs) with a digital workflow; however, clinical studies evaluating prosthetic efficacy are lacking. Purpose The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the prosthetic efficacy of definitive posterior single ISRs fabricated after scanning using a scannable healing abutment-scan peg (SHA-SP) in comparison with a conventional scan body (CSB). The time for data acquisition, quality of proximal and occlusal contacts, and relative occlusal force of ISRs were measured. Material and methods Twenty-four participants eligible for single ISRs to replace the mandibular first molar with adjacent and antagonist teeth present were randomly allocated to either a study group (n=12) receiving ISRs after intraoral scanning using an SHA-SP or a control group (n=12) receiving ISRs after intraoral scanning using CSB. During the surgical procedure, a prefabricated contoured scannable healing abutment was screwed to the implant in the SHA-SP group, while a custom-made healing abutment was used in the CSB group. After a healing period of 3 months, an intraoral scan was made, and the duration of data acquisition was recorded. The ISRs were milled from zirconia and evaluated for the quality of proximal and occlusal contacts using dental floss and shim stock, respectively. The relative occlusal forces of the ISRs and their contralateral natural teeth were measured using a digital occlusal analyzer. Statistical analysis was done using an independent sample t test for quantitative variables and a Pearson chi-squared test for qualitative variables between the tested groups (α=.05). Results The direct digital workflow using SHA-SP was statistically less time consuming than the CSB ( P <.001). The 2 groups were statistically similar regarding the quality of the proximal contacts ( P =.281) or occlusal contacts ( P =.307) and the relative occlusal forces of ISRs ( P= .315). The relative occlusal forces of the ISRs in both groups were significantly lower than those of their contralateral natural teeth ( P <.001). Conclusions Direct digital workflow using SHA-SP was more rapid, saving clinical chairside time, and produced proximal and occlusal contacts of comparable quality with those obtained with CSB. The relative occlusal forces of ISRs in both workflows were lower than their contralateral natural teeth.

Effect of different fabrication workflows on the passive fit of screw-retained bar splinting two interforaminal implants: a parallel blinded randomised clinical trial

Passive fit and time efficiency for prefabricated versus conventionally constructed cobalt chromium CAD\CAM 3-unit implant supported frameworks in free end saddle models: a pilot invitro study

Comparative Accuracy of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Workflows for Short Span Implant Supported Fixed Partial Denture Fabrication: An In Vitro Study

Single posterior implant-supported restorations fabricated using a scannable healing abutment versus a conventional scan body: A randomized controlled trial

DIGITAL SCANS, COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS, MAY EXPEDITE FABRICATION TIME FOR FULL-ARCH IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES WHILE MAINTAINING A COMPARABLE LEVEL OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS

Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Conventional Workflows for the Fabrication of Multi-Unit Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations: An Empty Review

Evaluation of patient satisfaction and maximum biting force of three differently constructed bars on two implants retaining mandibular overdenture - one year follow-up (a randomized controlled clinical trial)

Comparison between Conventional and Digital Workflow in Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of the digital manufacturing technique of cantilevered implant-supported frameworks on abutment screw preload

New 3D technologies applied to assess the long-term clinical effects of misfit of the full jaw fixed prosthesis on dental implants

A Double-Blind Randomized Within-Subject Study to Evaluate Clinical Applicability of Four Digital Workflows for the Fabrication of Posterior Single Implant Crown

Effect of prefabricated immediate interim prosthesis design and insertion workflow on seating accuracy on implants placed via static computer‐assisted implant surgery: A cross‐sectional in vitro study

Effect of Framework's Manufacturing Technique on Screw's Preload of Implant Supported Prosthesis

Effect of bar designs on peri implant tissues health in implant-supported removable prostheses: a systematic review

Immediate loading of multiple splinted implants via complete digital workflow: A pilot clinical study with 1-year follow-up.

A randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical fit and chairside adjustment time for implant-supported crowns fabricated by fully digital and partially digital techniques

Mechanical and biological behaviour of additive manufactured biomimetic biodegradable orthopaedic cortical screws

Accuracy of traditional open-tray impression, stereophotogrammetry, and intraoral scanning with prefabricated aids for implant-supported complete arch prostheses with different implant distributions: An in vitro study

Clinical assessment of maxillary screw-retained implant prosthesis fabricated from digital versus conventional full- arch implant impression. A randomized controlled clinical trial

Digitally Prefabricated Versus Conventionally Fabricated Implant-Supported Full-Arch Provisional Prosthesis: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillary full-arch screw-retained prosthesis: A crossover randomized trial