Abstract:In recent years, a discussion about the dissatisfaction of scientists with the current state of sociology has intensified in the world sociological community. In this situation, various ways of raising the scientific level of sociology as a whole are proposed. One of them was proposed by B. Latour in the framework of the actor-network theory (ANT), the theoretical concepts of which were further developed in the works of his like-minded colleages. Representatives of the Russian sociology are actively involved in a versatile study of the contribution made by the ANT to the development of sociology. The article studies the basic provisions of the actor-network theory concerning the subject specifics of sociological knowledge, the fundamental difference between the definition of understanding the subject of ANT sociology and the definitions given by traditional sociological trends and paradigms, as well as the consequences of this innovative understanding for the formation of methodological principles for studying social reality. The authors also dwell on the consideration of the most fundamental and controversial methodological innovation of ANT - the “turn to things” and the introduction of the concept of heterogeneity of agents into the understanding of social processes. Particular attention in the article is paid to the analysis of the meaning of the term “actant”, innovative for sociology, borrowed by the ANT from the semiotic theory of narrative and incorporated into sociology and ontology of the network of associations of heterogeneous actants. Concerning the disagreements between the actor-network theory and the sociological mainstream of our time, the authors dwell on the criticism by ANT theorists of the sociological &quot;metaphysics of social forces&quot;, understood as a way of theoretical legitimation of social inequality. The purpose of the article is to clarify the unity and interconnection of the key innovative positions of ANT in sociological methodology, and through this, to substantiate the significance and heuristic potential of the innovations proposed by the actor-network theory for raising the scientific level of sociology in the study of social reality. As a result, the authors demonstrate the methodological turn of ANT, that makes possible overcoming the gap between sociological theory and social and political practice, thus opening the way for building a new attitude of sociology to reality, returning it to solving not only scientific, but also social and practical problems.

Ethics in actor networks, or: what Latour could learn from Darwin and Dewey

Do Non-humans Make a Difference? The Actor-Network-Theory and the Social Innovation Paradigm

What is Actor-Network Theory——on Latour's Perspective

Actor-network theory: innovative aspects of sociological methodology

Actor-Network Theory and Digital Journalism

Open comments on Blok & Bruun Jensen's paper ‘What next for actor network theory? Inventing around Latour on a planet in distress’

In Search of a Network Theory of Innovations: Relations, Positions, and Perspectives

Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory

Social Autonomy and Heteronomy in the Age of ICT: The Digital Pharmakon and the (Dis)Empowerment of the General Intellect

The Problem of Applying the Actor-Network Theory Method in Media Theory and Media Communication

ANT AS A METHOD OF STUDYING THE SOCIAL ROLE OF ART

Everyday Ethics at the Border: Normative Ethics for the 21st Century

Different approaches to the moral status of AI: a comparative analysis of paradigmatic trends in Science and Technology Studies

The Rediscovery of Information Society: an Answer from Actor Network Theory

New Challenges for Ethics: The Social Impact of Posthumanism, Robots, and Artificial Intelligence

Constructing dystopian experience: A Neurath-Cartwrightian approach to the philosophy of social technology

Situating Moral Agency: How Postphenomenology Can Benefit Engineering Ethics

Actor-Network Theory in Intercultural Communication: Translation through the Prism of Innovation, Technology, Networks and Semiotics

Normativity, Autonomy, and Agency: A Critical Review of Three Essays on Agency in Nature, and a Modest Proposal for the Road Ahead

Collaborative ethics: innovating collaboration between ethicists and life scientists

Revisiting Friedrich Engels’s Dialectics of Nature in an Age of Digital Idealism