Abstract:We study the problem of screening in decision-making processes under uncertainty, focusing on the impact of adding an additional screening stage, commonly known as a 'gatekeeper.' While our primary analysis is rooted in the context of job market hiring, the principles and findings are broadly applicable to areas such as educational admissions, healthcare patient selection, and financial loan approvals. The gatekeeper's role is to assess applicants' suitability before significant investments are made. Our study reveals that while gatekeepers are designed to streamline the selection process by filtering out less likely candidates, they can sometimes inadvertently affect the candidates' own decision-making process. We explore the conditions under which the introduction of a gatekeeper can enhance or impede the efficiency of these processes. Additionally, we consider how adjusting gatekeeping strategies might impact the accuracy of selection decisions. Our research also extends to scenarios where gatekeeping is influenced by historical biases, particularly in competitive settings like hiring. We discover that candidates confronted with a statistically biased gatekeeping process are more likely to withdraw from applying, thereby perpetuating the previously mentioned historical biases. The study suggests that measures such as affirmative action can be effective in addressing these biases. While centered on hiring, the insights and methodologies from our study have significant implications for a wide range of fields where screening and gatekeeping are integral.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the impact of screening mechanisms (particularly the role of "gatekeepers") in decision-making processes under uncertainty, focusing on how these mechanisms influence the recruitment process. These principles and findings can be broadly applied to areas such as educational admissions, patient selection in healthcare, and financial loan approvals. The core issue of the paper is to study how adding an additional screening stage (i.e., introducing a "gatekeeper") affects the efficiency of the decision-making process. The role of the gatekeeper is to assess the suitability of applicants before making significant investments. The authors find that although the gatekeeper's initial intention is to simplify the screening process by filtering out candidates who are less likely to succeed, they sometimes inadvertently influence the decision-making process of the candidates. The paper further explores under what conditions the introduction of gatekeepers can improve or reduce the efficiency of these processes and considers how adjusting gatekeeping strategies affects the accuracy of selection decisions. Additionally, the paper discusses situations where the gatekeeping process is influenced by historical biases, especially in highly competitive environments such as recruitment. The authors find that candidates facing a statistically biased gatekeeping process are more likely to withdraw their applications, thereby exacerbating the previously mentioned historical biases. The paper suggests measures such as affirmative action policies can effectively address these issues. In summary, the main issues the paper attempts to address are: - What is the impact of introducing gatekeepers on the efficiency of decision-making processes such as recruitment? - How can gatekeeping strategies be adjusted to improve the accuracy of selection decisions? - How do gatekeepers influence candidate application behavior in the presence of historical biases?

The Gatekeeper Effect: The Implications of Pre-Screening, Self-selection, and Bias for Hiring Processes

Multi Stage Screening: Enforcing Fairness and Maximizing Efficiency in a Pre-Existing Pipeline

What You See Is What You Get? The Impact of Representation Criteria on Human Bias in Hiring

Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practices

Efficient candidate screening under multiple tests and implications for fairness

Michael is better than Mehmet: exploring the perils of algorithmic biases and selective adherence to advice from automated decision support systems in hiring

The Initial Screening Order Problem

Modeling Epistemological Principles for Bias Mitigation in AI Systems: An Illustration in Hiring Decisions

Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review

Fairness in Selection Problems with Strategic Candidates

"Finding the Magic Sauce": Exploring Perspectives of Recruiters and Job Seekers on Recruitment Bias and Automated Tools

On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers

What does it mean to solve the problem of discrimination in hiring? Social, technical and legal perspectives from the UK on automated hiring systems

BiasEye: A Bias-Aware Real-time Interactive Material Screening System for Impartial Candidate Assessment

Algorithms in selection decisions: Effective, but unappreciated

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Does AI Debias Recruitment? Race, Gender, and AI's "Eradication of Difference"

Downstream Effects of Affirmative Action

Quantitative measures of discrimination with application to appointment processes

Mind the Gap: A Causal Perspective on Bias Amplification in Prediction & Decision-Making

Average Profits of Prejudiced Algorithms