Understanding the Role of Large Language Models in Personalizing and Scaffolding Strategies to Combat Academic Procrastination

Ananya Bhattacharjee,Yuchen Zeng,Sarah Yi Xu,Dana Kulzhabayeva,Minyi Ma,Rachel Kornfield,Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed,Alex Mariakakis,Mary P Czerwinski,Anastasia Kuzminykh,Michael Liut,Joseph Jay Williams
2023-12-21
Abstract:Traditional interventions for academic procrastination often fail to capture the nuanced, individual-specific factors that underlie them. Large language models (LLMs) hold immense potential for addressing this gap by permitting open-ended inputs, including the ability to customize interventions to individuals' unique needs. However, user expectations and potential limitations of LLMs in this context remain underexplored. To address this, we conducted interviews and focus group discussions with 15 university students and 6 experts, during which a technology probe for generating personalized advice for managing procrastination was presented. Our results highlight the necessity for LLMs to provide structured, deadline-oriented steps and enhanced user support mechanisms. Additionally, our results surface the need for an adaptive approach to questioning based on factors like busyness. These findings offer crucial design implications for the development of LLM-based tools for managing procrastination while cautioning the use of LLMs for therapeutic guidance.
Human-Computer Interaction
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore how large language models (LLMs) can be used to personalize strategies to address academic procrastination. Specifically, the research focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Personalized Strategy Customization**: Understanding how users envision the role of LLMs in managing academic procrastination, particularly how they can provide structured, deadline-based planning advice tailored to individual circumstances. 2. **Challenges and Tensions**: Identifying potential challenges or points of tension in personalizing strategies using LLMs, such as the need for emotional support and factors that need to be considered in tool design. 3. **User Experience and Preferences**: Collecting key preferences and concerns regarding the design of academic procrastination management tools using LLMs through interviews with university students and experts in related fields, including the need for structured guidance and real-life case examples. 4. **Ethical Considerations**: Emphasizing the importance of carefully handling the boundaries of emotional support in developing such tools and ensuring that interventions align with validated strategies or clinical guidelines. In summary, this research aims to explore the potential and limitations of LLMs as auxiliary tools in academic settings, providing design guidance for the future development of more effective procrastination management tools that meet user needs.