Abstract:Bilateral trade is one of the most natural and important forms of economic interaction: A seller has a single, indivisible item for sale, and a buyer is potentially interested. The two parties typically have different, privately known valuations for the item, and ideally, they would like to trade if the buyer values the item more than the seller. The celebrated impossibility result by Myerson and Satterthwaite shows that any mechanism for this setting must violate at least one important desideratum. In this paper, we investigate a richer paradigm of bilateral trade, with many self-interested buyers and sellers on both sides of a single trade who cannot be excluded from the trade. We show that this allows for more positive results. In fact, we establish a dichotomy in the possibility of trading efficiently. If in expectation, the buyers value the item more, we can achieve efficiency in the limit. If this is not the case, then efficiency cannot be achieved in general. En route, we characterize trading mechanisms that encourage truth-telling, which may be of independent interest. We also evaluate our trading mechanisms experimentally, and the experiments align with our theoretical results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problems of efficiency and fairness in bilateral trade, especially in the presence of multiple self - interested buyers and sellers. Specifically, the paper explores how to design effective mechanisms to promote transactions between buyers and sellers in a single - transaction scenario, while satisfying incentive compatibility (i.e., encouraging participants to truthfully report their value assessments of items), individual rationality (i.e., the expected return from participating in the transaction is non - negative), weak budget balance (i.e., if a transaction occurs, the amount paid by the buyer is at least equal to the amount received by the seller), and efficiency (i.e., a transaction occurs only when the buyer's valuation of the item is higher than that of the seller).
### Background of the Paper and Problem Definition
Bilateral trade is one of the most basic and important forms of economic interaction, involving a seller who owns an indivisible commodity and a buyer who may be interested in this commodity. Buyers and sellers usually have different private value assessments of the commodity. Ideally, if the buyer's valuation of the commodity is higher than that of the seller, a transaction should occur. However, in actual scenarios, the value assessments of both parties are usually private, which complicates the design of effective trading mechanisms.
The classic impossibility result of Myerson and Satterthwaite shows that in bilateral trade with private value assessments, no mechanism can simultaneously satisfy the above four important properties. This has sparked researchers' interest in more complex scenarios, especially whether there are more effective solutions when both the buyer and the seller each consist of multiple self - interested members.
### Research Objectives
The main objective of the paper is to study whether there are mechanisms in bilateral trade with multiple buyers and multiple sellers that can overcome the impossibility result of Myerson and Satterthwaite. Specifically, the authors explore the following two main questions:
1. **When the average valuation of buyers is higher than that of sellers**: Can efficient transactions be achieved through simple deterministic mechanisms?
2. **When the average valuation of sellers is not lower than that of buyers**: Are there feasible mechanisms that can achieve near - optimal social benefits?
### Main Contributions
1. **Dichotomy of Deterministic Mechanisms**:
- If the average valuation of buyers is strictly higher than that of sellers, then almost all ideal properties can be achieved through a simple deterministic mechanism.
- If the average valuation of sellers is not lower than that of buyers, then even under the requirement of incentive compatibility, feasible mechanisms can only achieve an approximately optimal result strictly less than 1.
2. **Limitations of Random Mechanisms**:
- The authors further prove that even if randomization is allowed, as long as the mechanism is "well - behaved" (i.e., twice continuously differentiable), when the average valuation of sellers is not lower than that of buyers, no mechanism can achieve a constant - level approximately optimal result.
3. **Experimental Verification**:
- Through experimental verification, the authors' mechanisms can almost perfectly achieve all ideal properties when the average valuation of buyers is higher than that of sellers, especially when the number of participants is large enough.
### Conclusions
Through theoretical analysis and experimental verification, this paper shows that in bilateral trade with multiple buyers and multiple sellers, efficient transactions can be achieved under certain conditions through appropriate design. In particular, when the average valuation of buyers is higher than that of sellers, simple and deterministic mechanisms can achieve the desired effect. However, when the average valuation of sellers is not lower than that of buyers, even randomized mechanisms cannot overcome fundamental limitations. This research provides a new perspective for understanding and designing more complex bilateral trade mechanisms.