Abstract:Data valuation is concerned with determining a fair valuation of data from data sources to compensate them or to identify training examples that are the most or least useful for predictions. With the rising interest in personal data ownership and data protection regulations, model owners will likely have to fulfil more data deletion requests. This raises issues that have not been addressed by existing works: Are the data valuation scores still fair with deletions? Must the scores be expensively recomputed? The answer is no. To avoid recomputations, we propose using our data valuation framework DeRDaVa upfront for valuing each data source's contribution to preserving robust model performance after anticipated data deletions. DeRDaVa can be efficiently approximated and will assign higher values to data that are more useful or less likely to be deleted. We further generalize DeRDaVa to Risk-DeRDaVa to cater to risk-averse/seeking model owners who are concerned with the worst/best-cases model utility. We also empirically demonstrate the practicality of our solutions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in the context of an increasing number of data deletion requests, whether the existing data valuation methods are still fair and whether these valuation scores need to be recalculated. Specifically, the author focuses on how to ensure that after data deletion, the data valuation scores can still fairly reflect the contribution of each data source to the performance of the machine - learning model, and there is no need for expensive recalculation every time.
### Background of the Paper and Problem Description
With the rise of personal data ownership and data protection regulations (such as GDPR and CCPA), model owners may face more data deletion requests. This has raised a new question: are the existing data valuation methods still fair after data deletion? Must the valuation scores be recalculated to maintain their accuracy?
### Limitations of Existing Methods
Most of the existing data valuation methods are based on the semivalue in cooperative game theory, such as the Shapley value. These methods are effective when the data has not been deleted, but after data deletion, they may not be able to maintain the fairness axioms (such as interchangeability). In addition, recalculating the valuation scores after each data deletion is very expensive and may lead to valuation fluctuations, which are unacceptable to data owners and legislators.
### The Proposed New Method: DeRDaVa
To solve the above problems, the author proposes a new framework named Deletion - Robust Data Valuation (DeRDaVa). This framework aims to evaluate the contribution of each data source in advance after expected data deletion, thereby avoiding frequent recalculation. DeRDaVa is achieved in the following ways:
1. **Stochastic Cooperative Game**: Consider data deletion as a random process and define a random support set \(D\) that follows a certain probability distribution \(P_D\).
2. **Deletion - Robust Fairness Axioms**: Redefine axioms such as linearity, dummy player, interchangeability, and monotonicity to adapt to the situation of data deletion.
3. **NPO - Consistency Extension**: Through NPO - consistency extension, extend the valuation function of the original \(n\) data sources to any number of data sources to ensure that the valuation after deletion is still valid.
4. **Efficient Approximation**: Use Monte Carlo sampling and the 012 - MCMC algorithm to efficiently approximate the DeRDaVa scores, avoiding the complexity of exact calculation.
### Risk - Preference Extension: Risk - DeRDaVa
To adapt to model owners with different risk preferences, the author further proposes Risk - DeRDaVa, which can adjust the valuation method according to the risk attitude (risk - averse or risk - preferring) of the model owner. Risk - DeRDaVa uses Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) to quantify the risk and adjusts the valuation according to different risk levels.
### Summary
The main contribution of this paper is to propose a new data valuation framework, DeRDaVa, which can maintain the fairness and effectiveness of valuation in the case of data deletion and does not require frequent recalculation. In addition, the paper also considers the needs of model owners with different risk preferences and proposes Risk - DeRDaVa as an extension. This method provides an important theoretical basis and technical support for future research and practical applications.