Abstract:Europe as a whole as well as individual countries have many distinct pathways to net carbon neutrality by 2050. We use novel near-optimal modelling techniques to illuminate trade-offs and interactions between national and continental energy transitions under uncertainty. Our results reveal extensive and robust flexibility at a regional level in renewable and hydrogen investments as well as in hydrogen and electricity exports. However, Europe's energy interconnections lead to significant cross-border effects of national energy strategies. Wind and hydrogen investments can easily be shifted geographically within Europe, and Northern Europe's capacity as energy exporter or importer can shape and be shaped by the remaining system. Solar in Southern Europe and Germany comes out as an enabler, and can unlock design flexibility for the rest of the system. Quantifying these regional trade-offs in energy system planning is crucial in order to facilitate meaningful policy discussion and enable a fair energy transition.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the issue of design flexibility in the transition of the European energy system to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Specifically, the study employs a novel near-optimal modeling technique to reveal the trade-offs and interactions between national and continental-level energy transitions, considering uncertainty factors. The core objectives of the paper include: 1. **Demonstrate the flexibility of regional and national investment choices**: The study finds significant flexibility in investments in renewable energy (such as solar, onshore wind, and offshore wind) and hydrogen, particularly at the regional level. 2. **Quantify regional trade-offs**: The study quantifies the trade-offs faced by different regions in energy system planning, which is crucial for fostering meaningful policy discussions and achieving a fair energy transition. 3. **Explore the near-optimal solution space**: By using near-optimal solution methods, the study explores the near-optimal solution space of energy system models, which are slightly more expensive than cost-optimal solutions but consider the importance of social or geopolitical factors. 4. **Evaluate design flexibility under different scenarios**: The study considers multiple scenarios (including different technology costs, land use restrictions, and weather years) to ensure the robustness of the results. The main findings of the study include: - There is significant flexibility in investments for all the technologies examined (solar, onshore wind, offshore wind, hydrogen) at both the system and regional levels. - Even when considering uncertainties in costs, weather years, and land use, a large number of robust solutions can still be found. - The interconnected energy market within Europe provides more planning flexibility for various regions. - Decisions to invest in certain technologies and regions have a greater impact on the flexibility of the entire system, such as solar power generation in Germany being a system-wide driver. - Regional policies can have a significant impact on the energy systems of other parts of Europe, such as high investments in one region potentially crowding out similar investments elsewhere. - Policy decisions in certain regions not only affect competition but also significantly limit or enhance the flexibility of other regions in Europe. In summary, the study reveals that in the pursuit of Europe's net-zero emission goals, individual countries and regions have considerable design flexibility in their energy transition strategies, while also emphasizing the importance of the interactions between national and regional policy decisions.

Enabling agency: trade-offs between regional and integrated energy systems design flexibility

Diversity of options to eliminate fossil fuels and reach carbon neutrality across the entire European energy system

Synergies and competition: Examining flexibility options in the European electricity market

The value of decentral flexibility in nodal market design – A case study for Europe 2030

Hydrogen as Short-Term Flexibility and Seasonal Storage in a Sector-Coupled Electricity Market

Simulating flexibility, variability and decentralisation with an integrated energy system model for Great Britain

Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system

Overcoming the central planner approach - Bilevel optimization of the European energy transition

Grid Integration of Renewable Energy: Flexibility, Innovation, and Experience

The potential role of a hydrogen network in Europe

Broad Ranges of Investment Configurations for Renewable Power Systems, Robust to Cost Uncertainty and Near-Optimality

Quantifying seasonal hydrogen storage demands under cost and market uptake uncertainties in energy system transformation pathways

Modeling the transition of the multimodal pan-European energy system including an integrated analysis of electricity and gas transport

Linking Energy Policy, Electricity Generation and Transmission Using Strong Sustainability and Co-Optimization

Unleashing the full potential of the North Sea -- Identifying key energy infrastructure synergies for 2030 and 2040

Economic viability of flexibility options for smart energy systems with high penetration of renewable energy

Centralized and decentral approaches to succeed the 100% energiewende in Germany in the European context: A model-based analysis of generation, network, and storage investments

The Benefits of Cooperation in a Highly Renewable European Electricity Network

Offshore power and hydrogen networks for Europe's North Sea

Geographical balancing of wind power decreases storage needs in a 100% renewable European power sector

Reviewing local and integrated energy system models: insights into flexibility and robustness challenges