Mediation Analysis with Mendelian Randomization and Efficient Multiple GWAS Integration

Rita Qiuran Lyu,Chong Wu,Xinwei Ma,Jingshen Wang

2024-05-17

Abstract:Mediation analysis is a powerful tool for studying causal pathways between exposure, mediator, and outcome variables of interest. While classical mediation analysis using observational data often requires strong and sometimes unrealistic assumptions, such as unconfoundedness, Mendelian Randomization (MR) avoids unmeasured confounding bias by employing genetic variations as instrumental variables. We develop a novel MR framework for mediation analysis with genome-wide associate study (GWAS) summary data, and provide solid statistical guarantees. Our framework employs carefully crafted estimating equations, allowing for different sets of genetic variations to instrument the exposure and the mediator, to efficiently integrate information stored in three independent GWAS. As part of this endeavor, we demonstrate that in mediation analysis, the challenge raised by instrument selection goes beyond the well-known winner's curse issue, and therefore, addressing it requires special treatment. We then develop bias correction techniques to address the instrument selection issue and commonly encountered measurement error bias issue. Collectively, through our theoretical investigations, we show that our framework provides valid statistical inference for both direct and mediation effects with enhanced statistical efficiency compared to existing methods. We further illustrate the finite-sample performance of our approach through simulation experiments and a case study.

Methodology,Statistics Theory

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address a series of challenges faced when conducting mediation analysis within the framework of Mendelian Randomization (MR). Specifically, these issues include: 1. **Unmeasured Confounding Factors**: Traditional mediation analysis methods rely on observational data and often require the assumption that there are no unmeasured confounding factors. This assumption is difficult to meet in practical applications, leading to potential bias in causal effect estimation. 2. **Selection of Genetic Instrumental Variables**: When using genetic variants as instrumental variables, selecting appropriate instruments is a crucial issue. Improper selection may introduce biases such as the "Winner’s Curse" and the "Loser’s Curse." 3. **Measurement Error Bias**: Effect size estimates in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) often contain measurement errors, which can lead to biased estimation results. 4. **Limitations of Existing Methods**: Existing two-step MR and multivariable MR methods lack solid theoretical guarantees when performing mediation analysis and may not provide effective statistical inference. To address these challenges, the authors propose a new MR framework that integrates summary data from multiple GWAS to improve statistical efficiency and provides effective bias correction techniques to ensure valid causal effect estimation and statistical inference even when the selection of instrumental variables is imperfect. Specifically, this framework uses carefully designed estimating equations that allow the use of different sets of genetic variants to instrument the exposure and mediator variables, effectively integrating information from three independent GWAS. Additionally, the authors develop correction techniques for the issues of instrumental variable selection and measurement error bias to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the estimates.

Mediation Analysis with Mendelian Randomization and Efficient Multiple GWAS Integration

Dissecting the colocalized GWAS and eQTLs with mediation analysis for high-dimensional exposures and confounders

Generalized Multi-Snp Mediation Intersection-Union Test.

A mediation analysis framework based on variance component to remove genetic confounding effect

A robust two-sample Mendelian Randomization method integrating GWAS with multi-tissue eQTL summary statistics

Causal mediation analysis for time-varying heritable risk factors with Mendelian Randomization

Causal Mediation Analysis Leveraging Multiple Types of Summary Statistics Data

Powerful genome-wide design and robust statistical inference in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization

Reciprocal causation mixture model for robust Mendelian randomization analysis using genome-scale summary data

Mendelian randomization analysis using multiple biomarkers of an underlying common exposure

MR-LDP: a Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization for GWAS Summary Statistics Accounting for Linkage Disequilibrium and Horizontal Pleiotropy

Bayesian Weighted Mendelian Randomization for Causal Inference based on Summary Statistics

Causal Mediation Analysis for Integrating Exposure, Genomic, and Phenotype Data

New proposal to address mediation analysis interrogations by using genetic variants as instrumental variables

Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics

A Framework for Mediation Analysis with Multiple Exposures, Multivariate Mediators, and Non-Linear Response Models

Powerful Large-scale Inference in High Dimensional Mediation Analysis

Mediation analysis in longitudinal study with high-dimensional methylation mediators

Benchmarking Mendelian Randomization methods for causal inference using genome-wide association study summary statistics

Large-Scale Hypothesis Testing for Causal Mediation Effects with Applications in Genome-wide Epigenetic Studies

Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data