Pay to (Not) Play: Monetizing Impatience in Mobile Games

Taylor Lundy,Narun Raman,Hu Fu,Kevin Leyton-Brown

2023-12-16

Abstract:Mobile gaming is a rapidly growing and incredibly profitable sector; having grown seven-fold over the past 10 years, it now grosses over $100 billion annually. This growth was due in large part to a shift in monetization strategies: rather than charging players an upfront cost ("pay-to-play"), games often request optional microtransactions throughout gameplay ("free-to-play"). We focus on a common scenario in which games include wait times -- gating either items or game progression -- that players can pay to skip. Game designers typically say that they optimize for player happiness rather than revenue; however, prices for skips are typically set at levels that few players are willing to pay, leading to low purchase rates. Under a traditional analysis, it would seem that game designers fail at their stated goal if few players buy what they are selling. We argue that an alternate model can better explain this dynamic: players value tasks more highly as they are perceived to be more difficult. While skips can increase players' utilities by providing instant gratification, pricing skips too cheaply can lower players' utilities by decreasing the perceived amount of work needed to complete a task. We show that high revenue, high player utility, and low purchase rates can all coexist under this model, particularly under a realistic distribution of players having few buyers but a few big-spending "whales." We also investigate how a game designer should optimize prices under our model.

Computer Science and Game Theory

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems Addressed by the Paper

The paper explores a common strategy in mobile games to achieve profitability by setting waiting times (e.g., for task completion or game progress). Specifically, players can pay to skip these waiting times. However, there is a paradox in this strategy: although game designers claim they optimize for player satisfaction rather than revenue, the price to skip waiting times is usually set very high, resulting in few players willing to purchase.

The paper attempts to explain this phenomenon and proposes an alternative model to illustrate why high prices, high player satisfaction, and low purchase rates can coexist. The model is based on the following assumptions:
- Players' perceived value of a task is proportional to its difficulty.
- Cheap skip options reduce players' perceived value of the task because it decreases the amount of work required to complete the task.

Through this model, the paper explains why game designers can set high prices for skip options while still maintaining high player satisfaction and high revenue. Additionally, the paper examines how game designers can optimize prices under this model.

### Main Contributions
1. **Explanation of Existing Pricing Strategies**: The paper proposes a new model that explains why high-priced skip options can exist in practice and coexist with high player satisfaction and high revenue.
2. **Optimization of Pricing Strategies**: The paper provides methods for optimizing pricing under different player behavior assumptions, including fully sensitive, price-sensitive, and insensitive players.
3. **Theoretical and Empirical Analysis**: The paper validates the model's effectiveness through theoretical analysis and empirical research, demonstrating that under certain simplified assumptions, game designers can use traditional mechanism design tools to optimize prices.

### Conclusion
The paper explains the existence of high-priced skip options in mobile games through a new model and proposes methods for optimizing pricing strategies, providing theoretical support and practical guidance for game designers.