Abstract:We provide two improvements to Regev's recent quantum factoring algorithm (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2308.06572" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06572">arXiv:2308.06572</a>), addressing its space efficiency and its noise-tolerance. Our first contribution is to improve the quantum space efficiency of Regev's algorithm while keeping the circuit size the same. Our main result constructs a quantum factoring circuit using $O(n \log n)$ qubits and $O(n^{3/2} \log n)$ gates. We achieve the best of Shor and Regev (upto a logarithmic factor in the space complexity): on the one hand, Regev's circuit requires $O(n^{3/2})$ qubits and $O(n^{3/2} \log n)$ gates, while Shor's circuit requires $O(n^2 \log n)$ gates but only $O(n)$ qubits. As with Regev, to factor an $n$-bit integer $N$, we run our circuit independently $\approx \sqrt{n}$ times and applies Regev's classical postprocessing procedure. Our optimization is achieved by implementing efficient and reversible exponentiation with Fibonacci numbers in the exponent, rather than the usual powers of 2, adapting work by Kaliski (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1711.02491" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.02491">arXiv:1711.02491</a>) from the classical reversible setting to the quantum setting. This technique also allows us to perform quantum modular exponentiation that is efficient in both space and size without requiring significant precomputation, a result that may be useful for other quantum algorithms. A key ingredient of our exponentiation implementation is an efficient circuit for a function resembling in-place quantum-quantum modular multiplication. Our second contribution is to show that Regev's classical postprocessing procedure can be modified to tolerate a constant fraction of the quantum circuit runs being corrupted by errors. In contrast, Regev's analysis of his classical postprocessing procedure requires all $\approx \sqrt{n}$ runs to be successful. In a nutshell, we achieve this using lattice reduction techniques to detect and filter out corrupt samples.

Quantum Factoring Algorithm using Grover Search

An Efficient Quantum Factoring Algorithm

Factorization of large tetra and penta prime numbers on IBM quantum processor

Large-Scale Simulation of Shor's Quantum Factoring Algorithm

Quantum and Classical Combinatorial Optimizations Applied to Lattice-Based Factorization

Quantum Annealing for Prime Factorization

Experimental realisation of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using qubit recycling

Space-Efficient and Noise-Robust Quantum Factoring

A Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm for Factorization and Its Experimental Implementation

Efficient Implementation of a Quantum Search Algorithm for Arbitrary N

A Quantum Leap in Factoring

The State of Factoring on Quantum Computers

Factoring 15 with a remote quantum computer: A complete guide for beginners

Variational Quantum Eigensolver Approach to Prime Factorization on IBM's Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum Computer

Integer Factorization by Quantum Measurements

Demonstration of Shor's factoring algorithm for N=21 on IBM quantum processors

Shor’s Algorithm for Quantum Factoring

Quantum Factorization Of 143 On A Dipolar-Coupling Nuclear Magnetic Resonance System (Vol 108, 130501, 2012)

Pitfalls of the sublinear QAOA-based factorization algorithm

A comment on "Factoring integers with sublinear resources on a superconducting quantum processor"

Fast quantum integer multiplication with zero ancillas