Abstract:It is well known that Random Serial Dictatorship is strategy-proof and leads to a Pareto-Efficient outcome. We show that this result breaks down when individuals are allowed to make transfers, and adapt Random Serial Dictatorship to encompass trades between individuals. Strategic analysis of play under the new mechanisms we define is given, accompanied by simulations to quantify the gains from trade.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: after introducing monetary transfers in the Random Serial Dictatorship (RSD), how to design a new mechanism to ensure the Pareto - optimality and strategy - proofness of the allocation results. Specifically, the authors explored how the properties of the RSD mechanism would change when transactions and monetary transfers among participants were allowed, and compared it with the traditional RSD mechanism.
### Problem Background
The Random Serial Dictatorship (RSD) is a mechanism widely used in resource allocation problems, especially when allocating indivisible goods (such as housing, rooms, etc.). An important feature of the RSD mechanism is that it is strategy - proof without monetary transfers and can produce Pareto - Efficient results. However, in practical applications, participants often conduct transactions through informal markets, causing some assumptions of the RSD mechanism to no longer hold.
### Core Problems of the Paper
1. **Influence of Introducing Monetary Transfers**:
- When participants are allowed to make monetary transfers after RSD, do the Pareto - optimality and strategy - proofness of RSD still hold?
- How to design a new mechanism to adapt to this change so that the allocation result is still Pareto - optimal?
2. **Design and Analysis of the New Mechanism**:
- Proposed the "Random Serial Dictatorship with Ex - Post Transfers", and analyzed the strategic behaviors of participants under this mechanism.
- Explored whether the new mechanism can achieve Pareto - optimality and maximize social welfare under different conditions (such as complete information, incomplete information, etc.).
3. **Comparison and Evaluation**:
- Compared the new mechanism with the traditional RSD mechanism and evaluated its performance in different scenarios.
- Quantified the change in benefits after introducing monetary transfers through simulation experiments.
### Main Conclusions
- When monetary transfers are allowed, the traditional RSD mechanism is no longer Pareto - optimal because participants can obtain higher utility through transactions.
- The new mechanism with ex - post transfers can restore Pareto - optimality in some cases, but cannot guarantee strategy - proofness in all cases.
- Through simulation experiments, it was found that the new mechanism can significantly improve the total social welfare under specific conditions.
### Formula Representation
Some key formulas involved in the paper are as follows:
1. **Utility Function**:
\[
u_j(i, d)=v_j(i)+d
\]
where \( u_j(i, d) \) represents the utility of the \( j \) - th participant for item \( i \) and money \( d \), \( v_j(i) \) is the participant's valuation of item \( i \), and \( d \) is the amount of money.
2. **Definition of Competitive Equilibrium**:
\[
a(j)\in\arg\max_{i\in N}\left(v_j(i)-p(i)+p(e(j))\right)
\]
where \( p(i) \) is the price of item \( i \), and \( e(j) \) is the initial item of participant \( j \).
3. **Pareto Improvement**:
\[
\text{If there exists an allocation } a' \text{ and transfer } t' \text{ such that } u'_j(a', t')>u_j(a, t) \text{ for all } j \text{, then } (a', t') \text{ is called Pareto - improved.}
\]
Through these formulas and analysis, the paper reveals that the behavior of the RSD mechanism has changed significantly after introducing monetary transfers and proposes new mechanisms to deal with these changes.