Abstract:Terrestrial planets Venus and Earth have similar sizes, masses, and compositions.Global-scale subduction is unique on Earth, acting as a major carbon sink that transfers carbon from the surface to the interior.Venus, by contrast, lacks such long-lived subduction and thus a long-term carbon sink, which contributes to the thick green-house atmosphere.The high surface temperature prevents plate tectonics on modern Venus.Had Venus been a cool planet with a liquid ocean, would it develop global-scale plate tectonics as Earth did?To answer the question from a petrologist's perspective, we examined Venus's slab densities at hypothesized subduction-zone conditions.In our phase equilibria modeling, we used the bulk compositions of Venusian crust measured by the onboard XRF instruments of USSR spacecrafts Venera 13, Venera 14, and Vega 2. Our simulations show that eclogite facies is reached at a greater depth on Venus than on Earth, and Venus's slab densities are consistently lower than that of Earth's.For example, the average Venus's slab density may be lower than 3.2 g/cm 3 at 55 km along a warm geotherm (11.3 °C/km), whereas that of the Proterozoic Earth's slab may have exceeded 3.3 g/cm 3 [1] and approached mantle density.Venus was resurfaced in the past hundreds of millions of years, so its surface rocks represent modern crust.In the early history of Venus, the melting of a hotter mantle would have produced crustal rocks of higher Mg concentrations.Mgrich bulk composition results in even lighter metamorphic rocks, especially along a warm geotherm.Although plume-induced downwelling likely exists on Venus, but unlike early Earth, the dipping of the Venusian crustal rocks to mantle depth may fail to develop into self-sustained subduction.In sum, we speculate that the lack of sufficient density contrast between the metamorphosed slab and mantle rocks, and the slightly smaller gravitational acceleration, may have impeded self-sustained subduction on a planetary scale on Venus and diverged the evolution of its surface environment from that of Earth.[1] Emergence of blueschists on Earth linked to secular changes in oceanic crust composition, Palin, R. & White

Turning Earth into Venus: A Stochastic Model of Possible Evolutions of Terrestrial Topography

Was Venus Ever Habitable? Constraints from a Coupled Interior-Atmosphere-Redox Evolution Model

The Tectonics and Volcanism of Venus: New Modes Facilitated by Realistic Crustal Rheology and Intrusive Magmatism

Effect of surface-mantle water exchange parameterizations on exoplanet ocean depths

Modeling Venus-Like Worlds Through Time

Venus’ Light Crust Hinders Its Planetary-Scale Subduction

Volcanic and Tectonic Constraints on the Evolution of Venus

Venus’ light slab hinders its development of planetary-scale subduction and habitability

A dry Venusian interior constrained by atmospheric chemistry

The Long-Term Evolution of the Atmosphere of Venus: Processes and Feedback Mechanisms

Whole planet coupling between climate, mantle, and core: Implications for the evolution of rocky planets

Lithospheric Structure of Venusian Crustal Plateaus

A cool runaway greenhouse without surface magma ocean

Tectonic evolution of the terrestrial planets

Terrestrial Planet Evolution in the Stagnant-Lid Regime: Size Effects and the Formation of Self-Destabilizing Crust

Blue marble, stagnant lid: Could dynamic topography avert a waterworld?

Consequences of Tidal Dissipation in a Putative Venusian Ocean

Impact-driven planetary desiccation: The origin of the dry Venus

Exploring the Inner Edge of the Habitable Zone with Fully Coupled Oceans

Was Venus the First Habitable World of our Solar System?