Abstract:In this working paper, we turn our attention to two exemplary, cross-media shitstorms directed against well-known individuals from the business world. Both have in common, first, the trigger, a controversial statement by the person who thereby becomes the target of the shitstorm, and second, the identity of this target as relatively privileged: cis-male, white, successful. We examine the spread of the outrage wave across two media at a time and test the applicability of computational linguistic methods for analyzing its time course. Assuming that harmful language spreads like a virus in digital space, we are primarily interested in the events and constellations that lead to the use of harmful language, and whether and how a linguistic formation of "tribes" occurs. Our research therefore focuses, first, on the distribution of linguistic features within the overall shitstorm: are individual words or phrases increasingly used after their introduction, and through which pathways they spread. Second, we ask whether "tribes," for example, one group of supporters and one of opponents of the target, have a distinguished linguistic form. Our hypothesis is that supporters remain equally active over time, while the dynamic "ripple" effect of the shitstorm is based on the varying participation of opponents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **The spread mechanism of destructive languages (such as hate speech, insulting remarks, etc.) on the Internet across social media platforms, especially how to analyze the formation and development processes of two specific cross - platform Shitstorms through linguistic feature analysis.**
Specifically, the paper focuses on the following points:
1. **Trigger mechanism and characteristics of target persons**:
- The paper selected two representative Shitstorms cases, targeting well - known figures in the business world (Elon Musk and Carlos "Ocelote" Rodriguez respectively). The common characteristics of these events are that they were all triggered by controversial remarks, and the target persons are all relatively privileged groups (white, male, successful people).
2. **Spread path and media crossover**:
- Researchers analyzed the process of these negative emotions spreading from one virtual platform (such as Twitter) to another platform (such as Telegram or Reddit). They tested the applicability of computational linguistics methods in analyzing this time - progress, assuming that destructive languages spread like viruses through infection in cyberspace.
3. **Linguistic features and group formation**:
- The author studied the distribution of linguistic features at different stages of the Shitstorm process, especially whether certain words or phrases are used more frequently after being introduced and how they are spread. In addition, they explored the differences in linguistic features between supporters and opponents, and whether there is a language differentiation similar to "ethnic groups".
4. **Dynamic changes and toxicity levels**:
- The paper also examined the time - dynamics of Shitstorm, including the proportional change of toxic language. For example, in the case of Elon Musk, the proportion of toxic language on Telegram is much higher than that on Twitter; and in the case of the eSports CEO, the proportion of toxic language on Reddit is also significantly higher than that on Twitter.
5. **Model training and prediction**:
- Based on the collected data, researchers carried out preliminary machine - learning experiments, using the multilingual BERT model to classify different stages of Shitstorm and attempting to predict the attitudes of participants (supporters, opponents or neutrals), hoping to provide tools for future quantitative analysis.
In summary, this paper aims to reveal the language spread rules and social impacts of online Shitstorms through empirical research, so as to provide a scientific basis for understanding and dealing with such phenomena.