Abstract:With the growing prevalence of machine learning and artificial intelligence-based medical decision support systems, it is equally important to ensure that these systems provide patient outcomes in a fair and equitable fashion. This paper presents an innovative framework for detecting areas of algorithmic bias in medical-AI decision support systems. Our approach efficiently identifies potential biases in medical-AI models, specifically in the context of sepsis prediction, by employing the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm. We verify our methodology by conducting a series of synthetic data experiments, showcasing its ability to estimate areas of bias in controlled settings precisely. The effectiveness of the concept is further validated by experiments using electronic medical records from Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. These tests demonstrate the practical implementation of our strategy in a clinical environment, where it can function as a vital instrument for guaranteeing fairness and equity in AI-based medical decisions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to detect algorithmic bias in medical AI decision - support systems. Specifically, the authors propose an innovative framework to efficiently identify potential bias areas in medical AI models by using the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm, especially in the context of sepsis prediction. The paper verifies the effectiveness of the method through a series of synthetic data experiments and further conducts practical tests using the electronic medical record data of Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, demonstrating the practicality and reliability of this method in the clinical environment. ### Background of the Paper With the wide application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the medical field, it is particularly important to ensure that these systems provide fair and just patient outcomes. However, these systems may produce unfair results due to implicit biases in the training data. Therefore, detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias has become an important research direction. ### Main Contributions 1. **Model - independent Method**: The paper proposes a model - independent method to systematically and rigorously detect bias areas by retrospectively analyzing the results generated by medical AI prediction algorithms. This method fills the gap in current fairness evaluation methods, which usually assume known biases. 2. **Empirical Evaluation**: Through case studies using synthetic data and real data, the paper verifies the effectiveness of the technology, which can identify bias areas and understand the characteristics that define these areas. ### Method Overview The paper uses the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm to detect bias areas in medical AI models. The specific steps are as follows: 1. **Define Bias Areas**: Assume that the bias area \( S \) is defined by key variables (features) \( j\in S \). For continuous - valued features, it is represented as \( X_j\in [L_j, U_j] \), where \( L_j \) and \( U_j \) represent the lower and upper limits respectively. For categorical - valued features, it is represented as \( X_j\in C_j \). 2. **Performance Evaluation**: Use test data to evaluate the performance of the algorithm on different samples and calculate the residuals \( \epsilon_i = y_i - f(x_i) \). 3. **Estimate Bias Areas**: Estimate the bias area \( \hat{S} \) by maximizing the absolute value of the residuals within the bias area: \[ \hat{S}=\arg\max_{\hat{S}}\frac{1}{n(\hat{S})}\sum_{x_i\in\hat{S}}|\epsilon_i| \] ### Experimental Results The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the method through experiments with synthetic data and real data. The experimental results show that this method can accurately identify bias areas and provide an in - depth understanding of the characteristics of these areas. ### Conclusion The method proposed in the paper provides an effective tool for detecting algorithmic bias in medical AI models, which helps to ensure the fairness and justice of medical decisions, especially when dealing with diverse and under - represented patient groups.

Detecting algorithmic bias in medical-AI models using trees

An AI-Guided Data Centric Strategy to Detect and Mitigate Biases in Healthcare Datasets

Identifying and mitigating bias in algorithms used to manage patients in a pandemic

Unmasking bias in artificial intelligence: a systematic review of bias detection and mitigation strategies in electronic health record-based models

Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare

Toward fairness in artificial intelligence for medical image analysis: identification and mitigation of potential biases in the roadmap from data collection to model deployment

Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine

Unmasking Bias in AI: A Systematic Review of Bias Detection and Mitigation Strategies in Electronic Health Record-based Models

Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies

The Measurement and Mitigation of Algorithmic Bias and Unfairness in Healthcare AI Models Developed for the CMS AI Health Outcomes Challenge

Algorithmic fairness and bias mitigation for clinical machine learning with deep reinforcement learning

Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcare

Can AI Help Reduce Disparities in General Medical and Mental Health Care?

Improving Equity in Deep Learning Medical Applications with the Gerchberg-Saxton Algorithm

Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations

Turing test-inspired method for analysis of biases prevalent in artificial intelligence-based medical imaging

Bias in artificial intelligence for medical imaging: fundamentals, detection, avoidance, mitigation, challenges, ethics, and prospects

Addressing Algorithmic Bias and the Perpetuation of Health Inequities: An AI Bias Aware Framework

Racial Bias in Clinical and Population Health Algorithms: A Critical Review of Current Debates

Mitigating the risk of artificial intelligence bias in cardiovascular care

AI-Driven Healthcare: A Survey on Ensuring Fairness and Mitigating Bias