Abstract:A considerable number of photographic plate archives exist world wide and digitization is in progress or already has been finished. Not only different type of scanners were used but also spatial resolution and dynamic range often were limited due to process duration and storage space. The open question is the effect of these limitations on the results. 61 high resolution photographic plates of the Gamma Cyg field from the Bruce astrograph at Landessternwarte Heidelberg--Königstuhl (aperture 40~cm, focal length 200~cm) had been digitized both in Heidelberg and Sonneberg. Both scanners were set to 16 bit dynamic range. The Heidelberg scanner was operated at 2540 dpi resolution, resulting in a scale of 1 arcsec/pixel, while the Sonneberg scanner was operated at 1200 dpi, yielding a scale of 2.1 arsec/pixel. In the presented study the standard deviation of non--variable star light curves were examined in dependence of brightness and plate coordinates in both series. No evident differences could be found. A comparison of the analysis of both scan series will be presented.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the influence of scanners with different resolutions on astrometric and photometric results. Specifically, the researchers are concerned with: 1. **The influence of different scanning resolutions on astrometric and photometric accuracy**: By comparing the scanning results of the same set of high - resolution astronomical plates by two scanners with different resolutions (Heidelberg and Sonneberg), the researchers hope to understand whether the difference in scanning resolution will have a significant impact on the final astrometric and photometric results. 2. **The influence of scanning parameters on the results**: The two scanners used in the study are different not only in resolution (Heidelberg is 2540 dpi, Sonneberg is 1200 dpi), but also in pixel scale (Heidelberg is 1.03 arcsec/pixel, Sonneberg is 2.15 arcsec/pixel). In addition, both use a 16 - bit dynamic range for scanning. The researchers hope to evaluate the specific influence of these different scanning parameters on the final results through these different scanning parameters. ### Summary of main problems - **Astrometric accuracy**: The researchers evaluated the astrometric accuracy by calculating the deviation between the celestial body positions of each scanning series and the standard positions in the UCAC4 catalogue. - **Photometric accuracy**: The researchers analyzed the standard deviation of the light - curve of stars and conducted a detailed study according to the changes in brightness and plate coordinates to evaluate the photometric error. ### Key findings - **In terms of astrometry**: Due to its higher resolution, the Heidelberg scan is slightly better than the Sonneberg scan in astrometry (2.02 arcsec vs 2.18 arcsec), but the difference is not significant. - **In terms of photometry**: For brighter stars (magnitude 10 - 12), the photometric error distribution is wide, probably because these stars are saturated on the plate. For medium - brightness stars (magnitude 12 - 16), the photometric errors of the two scanning series are almost the same. For fainter stars (magnitude 16 - 18), the Sonneberg scan performs better instead, and after down - sampling (binning) the Heidelberg scan, the photometric accuracy is improved. ### Conclusion The main conclusion of the study is that for these plates, a higher scanning resolution (such as 2540 dpi of Heidelberg) is not necessary. On the contrary, the lower - resolution Sonneberg scan shows better photometric performance when dealing with fainter stars. This may be because a higher - resolution scan may lead to isolated signal pixels, thus affecting the results of isophotal photometry. ### Future work The researchers point out that it is necessary to further analyze the influence of different scanning resolutions on the results of low - resolution plates and further explore why the lower - resolution scan performs better in some cases.

A study of photometric errors on two different photographic plate scans