Abstract:In many repeated auction settings, participants care not only about how frequently they win but also how their winnings are distributed over time. This problem arises in various practical domains where avoiding congested demand is crucial, such as online retail sales and compute services, as well as in advertising campaigns that require sustained visibility over time. We introduce a simple model of this phenomenon, modeling it as a budgeted auction where the value of a win is a concave function of the time since the last win. This implies that for a given number of wins, even spacing over time is optimal. We also extend our model and results to the case when not all wins result in "conversions" (realization of actual gains), and the probability of conversion depends on a context. The goal is to maximize and evenly space conversions rather than just wins. We study the optimal policies for this setting in second-price auctions and offer learning algorithms for the bidders that achieve low regret against the optimal bidding policy in a Bayesian online setting. Our main result is a computationally efficient online learning algorithm that achieves $\tilde O(\sqrt T)$ regret. We achieve this by showing that an infinite-horizon Markov decision process (MDP) with the budget constraint in expectation is essentially equivalent to our problem, even when limiting that MDP to a very small number of states. The algorithm achieves low regret by learning a bidding policy that chooses bids as a function of the context and the system's state, which will be the time elapsed since the last win (or conversion). We show that state-independent strategies incur linear regret even without uncertainty of conversions. We complement this by showing that there are state-independent strategies that, while still having linear regret, achieve a $(1-\frac 1 e)$ approximation to the optimal reward.

Transaction Ordering Auctions

Buying Time: Latency Racing vs. Bidding in Transaction Ordering

Simultaneous Vs. Sequential Auctions, Intensity of Competition and Uncertainty

Shared Sequencing and Latency Competition as a Noisy Contest

Simultaneous Vs. Sequential Sales: Bidder Competition and Supply Uncertainty

Simultaneous Vs. Sequential Sales, Intensity of Competition and Uncertainty

Frequent batch auction versus continuous time auction under order cancellation and maker‐taker fee

Throttling Equilibria in Auction Markets

Bidding in Uniform Price Auctions for Value Maximizing Buyers

Pacing Equilibrium in First-Price Auction Markets

Autobidders with Budget and ROI Constraints: Efficiency, Regret, and Pacing Dynamics

Order but Not Execute in Order

Designing Hybrid Mechanisms to Overcome Congestion in Sequential Dutch Auctions

Auctions with resale at a later date

Dynamic Auctions with Bank Accounts

All-pay Auctions with Endogenous Bid Timing: an Experimental Study

Efficiency of Non-Truthful Auctions in Auto-bidding with Budget Constraints

Clearing time randomization and transaction fees for auction market design

Budget Pacing in Repeated Auctions: Regret and Efficiency without Convergence

Learning in Budgeted Auctions with Spacing Objectives

The Complexity of Pacing for Second-Price Auctions