Abstract:Humans have now lived aboard the International Space Station (ISS) for 20 years ([ 1 ][1]). As we look toward the next 20 years, we must address the dangers that space debris poses to both manned missions and crucial satellites. National policy-makers and international organizations must develop actionable rules and regulations that preserve our ability to explore space.With tens of millions of pieces of space junk rocketing around our planet at thousands of kilometers an hour, debris is a substantial threat to our expanding networks of satellites and even the ISS itself ([ 2 ][2]–[ 4 ][3]). The European Space Agency (ESA) puts much of the blame on the failure to properly dispose of expiring satellites ([ 2 ][2]). The recently signed Artemis Accords similarly point to the value of "end-of-mission planning and implementation [and…] post-mission disposal" in reducing debris ([ 5 ][4]). With the rapid expansion of the satellite orbital population—many of which are relatively cheaply produced with comparatively high failure rates ([ 6 ][5])—this problem will likely get much worse before it gets better.Unfortunately, Cold War cooperation led to rules designed primarily for nation states, not for the corporations that are now launching literally thousands of new satellites. Meanwhile, the nation states have mostly neglected to implement the necessary local space regulations that would promote the long-term sustainability of equitable space exploration. This tragedy of the commons will damage the space environment and eventually impair commercial space endeavors. Space debris threatens efforts ranging from the emerging mini-satellite mega-constellations that aim to democratize internet access to space tourism. In a worst case scenario, orbital debris could start a self-sustaining cascade of destruction that would litter the Low Earth Orbit with enough debris to make it effectively unusable ([ 7 ][6]).To maintain a sustainable space environment, all states and their nationals must take responsibility for reducing the creation of new space debris. Both nations and private corporations should design more reliable satellites that are less likely to malfunction, deorbit satellites before they become inoperable and hazardous, and promote the emerging private-sector industries that are collecting defunct satellites and repairing and refueling older satellites. Developing public-private collaborations can enhance the tracking of even small man-made particles zooming around in orbit.The United Nations' Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) may be the most appropriate forum to accomplish these goals. COPUOS can provide both the desperately needed development of norms, the required regulatory support, and the necessary scientific and technical expertise to direct these efforts. During the past 20 years, astronauts on the ISS have conducted space-based research representing the work of scientists from more than 100 countries ([ 1 ][1]), and science diplomacy has often prefaced cross-boundary collaboration on Earth. We must preserve the amazing opportunities space exploration provides by developing better sustainable practices before it is too late.1. [↵][7]National Aeronautics and Space Administration, "International Space Station facts and figures" (2020); [www.nasa.gov/feature/facts-and-figures][8]. 2. [↵][9]ESA, "The current state of space debris" (2020); [www.esa.int/Safety\_Security/Space\_Debris/The\_current\_state\_of\_space_debris][10]. 3. ESA, "Space Debris by the numbers" (2020); [www.esa.int/Safety\_Security/Space\_Debris/Space\_debris\_by\_the\_numbers][11]. 4. [↵][12]1. R. Khatchadourian , "The elusive peril of space junk," The New Yorker (2020). 5. [↵][13]"The Artemis Accords: Principles for cooperation in the civil exploration and use of the Moon, Mars, Comets, and Asteroids for peaceful purposes" (2020), pp. 6–7; [www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis-accords/img/Artemis-Accords-signed-13Oct2020.pdf][14]. 6. [↵][15]1. S. A Jacklin , "Small-satellite mission failure rates," NASA Technical Memorandum (2019); . 7. [↵][16]1. D. J. Kessler , J. Spacecraft Rockets 18, 357 (1981). [OpenUrl][17] [1]: #ref-1 [2]: #ref-2 [3]: #ref-4 [4]: #ref-5 [5]: #ref-6 [6]: #ref-7 [7]: #xref-ref-1-1 "View reference 1 in text" [8]: http://www.nasa.gov/feature/facts-and-figures [9]: #xref-ref-2-1 "View reference 2 in text" [10]: http://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Space_Debris/The_current_state_of_space_debris [11]: http://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Space_Debris/Space_debris_by_the_numbers [12]: #xref-ref-4-1 "View reference 4 in text" [13]: #xref-ref-5-1 "View reference 5 in text" [14]: http://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis-accords/img/Artemis-Accords-signed-13Oct2020.pdf [15]: #xref-ref-6-1 "View reference 6 in text" [16]: #xref-ref-7-1 -Abstract Truncated-

The Influence of Epistemic Communities on International Political Negotiations about the Space Debris Problem

A Population Dynamics Approach to the Distribution of Space Debris in Low Earth Orbit

Astro‐Environmentalism: Towards a Polycentric Governance of Space Debris

The Status of the Operational Debris Mitigation Systems Regulatory Policy: Current Issues and Future Perspectives

Space Diplomacy and the Artemis Accords

Model of an International Environmental Agreement among Asymmetric Nations applied to Debris Mitigation

Tipping Points of Space Debris in Low Earth Orbit

International cooperation and competition in orbit-use management

Large satellite constellations and space debris: Exploratory analysis of strategic management of the space commons

A Panacea to Address the Legal, Administrative and Economic Aspects of Space Debris

Space sustainability through atmosphere pollution? De-orbiting, atmosphere-blindness and planetary environmental injustice

The Influence of Social Movements on Space Astronomy Policy

Space debris puts exploration at risk

Dynamics of space debris removal: A review

OPUS: An Integrated Assessment Model for Satellites and Orbital Debris

Space debris removal – Review of technologies and techniques. Flexible or virtual connection between space debris and service spacecraft

Addressing Space Tourism’s Environmental Effects: Marine Environment Regulations as a Basis for Regulating Orbital Space Debris

Upgrading Space Debris Mitigation Measures to Cope with Proliferating Cyber Threats to Space Activities

Density-based evolutionary model of the space debris environment in low-Earth orbit

Regulatory Context of Conflicting Uses of Outer Space: Astronomy and Satellite Constellations

Assessing the Principle of Equitable Access versus Non-Appropriation in the Era of Mega-Constellations