Reducing Histopathology Slide Magnification Improves the Accuracy and Speed of Ovarian Cancer Subtyping

Jack Breen,Katie Allen,Kieran Zucker,Nicolas M. Orsi,Nishant Ravikumar
2023-11-23
Abstract:Artificial intelligence has found increasing use for ovarian cancer morphological subtyping from histopathology slides, but the optimal magnification for computational interpretation is unclear. Higher magnifications offer abundant cytological information, whereas lower magnifications give a broader histoarchitectural overview. Using attention-based multiple instance learning, we performed the most extensive analysis of ovarian cancer tissue magnifications to date, with data at six magnifications subjected to the same preprocessing, hyperparameter tuning, cross-validation and hold-out testing procedures. The lowest magnifications (1.25x and 2.5x) performed best in cross-validation, and intermediate magnifications (5x and 10x) performed best in hold-out testing (62% and 61% accuracy, respectively). Lower magnification models were also significantly faster, with the 5x model taking 5% as long to train and 31% as long to evaluate slides compared to 40x. This indicates that the standard usage of high magnifications for computational ovarian cancer subtyping may be unnecessary, with lower magnifications giving faster, more accurate alternatives.
Image and Video Processing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is determining which tissue slide magnification provides the best accuracy and speed in the classification of ovarian cancer subtypes. Currently, the application of artificial intelligence in the morphological subtype classification of ovarian cancer is increasing, but the optimal computational magnification is still unclear. High magnification can provide rich cytological information, while low magnification can offer a broader overview of tissue structure. Therefore, the researchers hope to find a suitable magnification through this study that can improve accuracy and speed up processing. Specifically, the paper conducts the most comprehensive analysis of ovarian cancer tissue slides at six different magnifications (1.25x, 2.5x, 5x, 10x, 20x, and 40x) using an attention-based multiple instance learning (ABMIL) method. The results show that lower magnifications (such as 1.25x and 2.5x) perform best in cross-validation, while medium magnifications (such as 5x and 10x) perform best on external test sets. Additionally, the training and evaluation speed of low magnification models is significantly faster. Overall, this study aims to optimize the computational methods for ovarian cancer subtype classification, reducing the reliance on high magnification images, thereby improving the accuracy and efficiency of classification.