Abstract:While generative diffusion models excel in producing high-quality images, they can also be misused to mimic authorized images, posing a significant threat to AI systems. Efforts have been made to add calibrated perturbations to protect images from diffusion-based mimicry pipelines. However, most of the existing methods are too ineffective and even impractical to be used by individual users due to their high computation and memory requirements. In this work, we present novel findings on attacking latent diffusion models (LDM) and propose new plug-and-play strategies for more effective protection. In particular, we explore the bottleneck in attacking an LDM, discovering that the encoder module rather than the denoiser module is the vulnerable point. Based on this insight, we present our strategy using Score Distillation Sampling (SDS) to double the speed of protection and reduce memory occupation by half without compromising its strength. Additionally, we provide a robust protection strategy by counterintuitively minimizing the semantic loss, which can assist in generating more natural perturbations. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to substantiate our findings and comprehensively evaluate our newly proposed strategies. We hope our insights and protective measures can contribute to better defense against malicious diffusion-based mimicry, advancing the development of secure AI systems. The code is available in <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/xavihart/Diff-Protect" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to provide effective protection measures against malicious imitation attacks on Diffusion Models. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to protect images from imitation attacks based on diffusion models by introducing perturbations, while reducing the computational and memory costs of these protection measures to make them more practical, especially for individual users.
### Background and Motivation of the Paper
Generative Diffusion Models (GDMs) have achieved remarkable success in image synthesis and editing tasks. However, these models can also be misused to maliciously imitate others' images, such as unauthorized GDM - based inpainting of victims' photos or imitating artists' styles without legal authorization. Therefore, how to effectively protect images from such attacks has become an important research topic.
### Problems of Existing Methods
Although existing protection methods can deceive diffusion models to a certain extent and produce chaotic results, they have the following two main problems:
1. **High Computational Cost**: When attacking GDMs, it is necessary to calculate the gradient of the output image with respect to the GDM input, which brings a huge computational burden, especially in the individual user environment.
2. **Insufficient Exploration of Design Space**: Existing methods have not fully explored the design space of attacking diffusion models, especially the mechanisms and principles regarding the effectiveness of each component.
### Main Contributions of the Paper
1. **Revealing the Attack Bottleneck**: The paper finds that the main influence point in attacking the Latent Diffusion Model (LDM) lies in the Encoder, not the Denoiser. The Encoder is relatively more vulnerable, while the latter is more robust.
2. **Proposing an Efficient Protection Framework**: By introducing the Score Distillation Sampling (SDS) technique, the paper proposes a new optimization strategy, which significantly reduces the demand for computational resources while maintaining the effectiveness of protection.
3. **Systematically Exploring the Design Space**: The paper systematically explores the design space of attacking LDM for the first time and discovers two possible attack directions: maximizing and minimizing semantic loss. Among them, minimizing semantic loss can bring a more natural and competitive protection effect.
### Methods and Experiments
1. **Score Distillation Sampling (SDS)**: By approximately calculating the gradient of semantic loss, the SDS technique significantly reduces the computational complexity and memory usage.
2. **Gradient Descent and Ascent**: The paper finds that minimizing semantic loss (i.e., using gradient descent) can produce more natural perturbations, while maximizing semantic loss (i.e., using gradient ascent) will produce more chaotic patterns.
3. **Experimental Verification**: The paper verifies the effectiveness of the above - mentioned methods through extensive experiments, including multiple scenarios such as global image - to - image editing, inpainting, and textual inversion.
### Conclusion
By revealing the bottleneck of attacking LDM and proposing an efficient protection framework, the paper provides new ideas and methods for preventing malicious imitation based on diffusion models. These methods not only perform excellently in protection effects but also significantly reduce computational and memory costs, enabling individual users to easily apply them.