Abstract:In recent works, much progress has been made with regards to so-called randomized measurement strategies, which include the famous methods of classical shadows and shadow tomography. In such strategies, unknown quantum states are first measured (or ``learned''), to obtain classical data that can be used to later infer (or ``predict'') some desired properties of the quantum states. Even if the used measurement procedure is fixed, surprisingly, estimations of an exponential number of vastly different quantities can be obtained from a polynomial amount of measurement data. This raises the question of just how powerful ``measure-first'' strategies are, and in particular, if all quantum machine learning problems can be solved with a measure-first, analyze-later scheme. This paper explores the potential and limitations of these measure-first protocols in learning from quantum data. We study a natural supervised learning setting where quantum states constitute data points, and the labels stem from an unknown measurement. We examine two types of machine learning protocols: ``measure-first'' protocols, where all the quantum data is first measured using a fixed measurement strategy, and ``fully-quantum'' protocols where the measurements are adapted during the training process. Our main result is a proof of separation. We prove that there exist learning problems that can be efficiently learned by fully-quantum protocols but which require exponential resources for measure-first protocols. Moreover, we show that this separation persists even for quantum data that can be prepared by a polynomial-time quantum process, such as a polynomially-sized quantum circuit. Our proofs combine methods from one-way communication complexity and pseudorandom quantum states. Our result underscores the role of quantum data processing in machine learning and highlights scenarios where quantum advantages appear.

Limitations of measure-first protocols in quantum machine learning

The Learnability of Unknown Quantum Measurements

Exponential separations between classical and quantum learners

Demonstration of Robust and Efficient Quantum Property Learning with Shallow Shadows

Single-shot quantum machine learning

Quantum machine learning of large datasets using randomized measurements

Few measurement shots challenge generalization in learning to classify entanglement

Shadows of quantum machine learning

On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical data

Time-series quantum reservoir computing with weak and projective measurements

Exponential quantum advantages in learning quantum observables from classical data

Experimental Quantum State Measurement with Classical Shadows

Quantum Event Learning and Gentle Random Measurements

The curse of random quantum data

Harnessing quantum back-action for time-series processing

Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning

Exponential learning advantages with conjugate states and minimal quantum memory

Postselection-free learning of measurement-induced quantum dynamics

Quantum state testing with restricted measurements

On quantum backpropagation, information reuse, and cheating measurement collapse

New Bounds on Quantum Sample Complexity of Measurement Classes