Abstract:Despite some discomfort with this grandly philosophical topic, I do in fact hope to address a venerable pair of philosophical chestnuts: mathematical truth and existence. My plan is to set out three possible stands on these issues, for an exercise in compare and contrast. A word of warning, though, to philosophical purists (and perhaps of comfort to more mathematical readers): I will explore these philosophical positions with an eye to their interconnections with some concrete issues of set theoretic method. Let me begin with a brief look at what to count as ‘philosophy’. To some extent, this is a matter of usage, and mathematicians sometimes classify as ‘philosophical’ any considerations other than outright proofs. So, for example, discussions of the propriety of particular mathematical methods would fall under this heading: should we prefer analytic or synthetic approaches in geometry? Should elliptic functions be treated in terms of explicit representations (as in Weierstrass) or geometrically (as in Riemann)? Should we allow impredicative definitions? Should we restrict ourselves to a logic without bivalence or the law of the excluded middle? Also included in this category would be the trains of thought that shaped our central concepts: should a function always be defined by a formula? Should a group be required to have an inverse for every element? Should ideal divisors be defined contextually or explicitly, treated computationally or abstractly? In addition, there are more general questions concerning mathematical values, aims and goals: Should we strive for powerful theories or low-risk theories? How much stress should be placed on the fact or promise of physical applications? How important are interconnections between the various branches of mathematics? These philosophical questions of method naturally include several peculiar to set theory: should set theorists focus their efforts on drawing consequences for areas of interest to mathematicians outside mathematical logic? Should exploration of the standard axioms of ZFC be preferred to the exploration and exploitation of new axioms? How should axioms for set theory be chosen? What would a solution to the Continuum Problem look like?

A Renunciation of Axiom, A New Conception of Logic

Rethinking set theory

Mathematical Existence

Definability in the Real Universe

An approach to basic set theory and logic

Intuitionistic Mathematics and Logic

Epistemological Notes on Mathematics

Clear Thinking, vague thinking and paradoxes

Logic and Paradox

Abstraction Logic: A New Foundation for (Computer) Mathematics

On foundations for deductive mathematics

Independence Phenomena in Mathematics: a Set Theoretic Perspective on Current Obstacles and Scenarios for Solutions

Der Code der Mathematik

Hilbert, logicism, and mathematical existence

Axiomatizing mathematical conceptualism in third order arithmetic

Learning Formal Mathematics From Intrinsic Motivation

Dedekind and Wolffian Deductive Method

The ultimate tactics of self-referential systems

Refining the taming of the Reverse Mathematics zoo

The Axiomatic-Deductive Ideal in Early Modern Thinking: A Cognitive History of Human Rationality

The Mathematical Discipline of Thought in the Light of Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology