AI Ethics and Ordoliberalism 2.0: Towards A 'Digital Bill of Rights'

Manuel Woersdoerfer
2023-10-27
Abstract:This article analyzes AI ethics from a distinct business ethics perspective, i.e., 'ordoliberalism 2.0.' It argues that the ongoing discourse on (generative) AI relies too much on corporate self-regulation and voluntary codes of conduct and thus lacks adequate governance mechanisms. To address these issues, the paper suggests not only introducing hard-law legislation with a more effective oversight structure but also merging already existing AI guidelines with an ordoliberal-inspired regulatory and competition policy. However, this link between AI ethics, regulation, and antitrust is not yet adequately discussed in the academic literature and beyond. The paper thus closes a significant gap in the academic literature and adds to the predominantly legal-political and philosophical discourse on AI governance. The paper's research questions and goals are twofold: First, it identifies ordoliberal-inspired AI ethics principles that could serve as the foundation for a 'digital bill of rights.' Second, it shows how those principles could be implemented at the macro level with the help of ordoliberal competition and regulatory policy.
Computers and Society,General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the shortcomings in the current ethical governance of artificial intelligence, particularly the lack of governance mechanisms resulting from reliance on corporate self-regulation and voluntary codes of conduct. Specifically, the paper proposes the following two main objectives: 1. **Identify and analyze AI ethical principles inspired by ordoliberalism**: These principles can serve as the foundation for a "Digital Bill of Rights." These principles include respect for human rights, data protection and privacy rights, the principles of harm prevention and beneficence, non-discrimination and equality, fairness and justice, transparency and explainability, responsibility and accountability, democracy and the rule of law, and environmental and social sustainability. 2. **Demonstrate how to implement these principles at the national level through ordoliberalism-inspired competition policy and regulatory policy**: In this way, the paper seeks to fill the current gap in academic discussions regarding the connection between AI ethics, regulation, and antitrust, and proposes a more effective governance structure. In summary, this paper aims to enhance the effectiveness and enforceability of AI ethical governance by introducing stringent legal regulations and competition policies, thereby addressing the inadequacies of existing soft guidelines in practical application.