SDSS-IV from 2014 to 2016: A Detailed Demographic Comparison over Three Years

Amy M. Jones,Rachael L. Beaton,Brian A. Cherinka,Karen L. Masters,Sara Lucatello,Aleksandar M. Diamond-Stanic,Sarah A. Bird,Michael R. Blanton,Katia Cunha,Emily E. Farr,Diane Feuillet,Peter M. Frinchaboy,Alex Hagen,Karen Kinemuchi,Britt Lundgren,Mariarosa L. Marinelli,Adam D. Myers,Alexandre Roman-Lopes,Ashley J. Ross,Jose R. Sanchez-Gallego,Sarah J. Schmidt,Jennifer Sobeck,Keivan G. Stassun,Jamie Tayar,Mariana Vargas-Magana,J. C. Wilson,Gail Zasowski

2023-11-15

Abstract:The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is one of the largest international astronomy organizations. We present demographic data based on surveys of its members from 2014, 2015 and 2016, during the fourth phase of SDSS (SDSS-IV). We find about half of SDSS-IV collaboration members were based in North America, a quarter in Europe, and the remainder in Asia and Central and South America. Overall, 26-36% are women (from 2014 to 2016), up to 2% report non-binary genders. 11-14% report that they are racial or ethnic minorities where they live. The fraction of women drops with seniority, and is also lower among collaboration leadership. Men in SDSS-IV were more likely to report being in a leadership role, and for the role to be funded and formally recognized. SDSS-IV collaboration members are twice as likely to have a parent with a college degree, than the general population, and are ten times more likely to have a parent with a PhD. This trend is slightly enhanced for female collaboration members. Despite this, the fraction of first generation college students (FGCS) is significant (31%). This fraction increased among collaboration members who are racial or ethnic minorities (40-50%), and decreased among women (15-25%). SDSS-IV implemented many inclusive policies and established a dedicated committee, the Committee on INclusiveness in SDSS (COINS). More than 60% of the collaboration agree that the collaboration is inclusive; however, collaboration leadership more strongly agree with this than the general membership. In this paper, we explain these results in full, including the history of inclusive efforts in SDSS-IV. We conclude with a list of suggested recommendations based on our findings, which can be used to improve equity and inclusion in large astronomical collaborations, which we argue is not only moral, but will also optimize their scientific output.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate and analyze the demographic characteristics of the members of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) - Phase IV (SDSS - IV) during 2014 - 2016 and their changes. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Geographical distribution**: Analyze the distribution of SDSS - IV members in different regions, including North America, Europe, Asia, Central America and South America, etc.

2. **Gender ratio**: Research the gender distribution among SDSS - IV members, especially the proportion of female members and its changing trend over time. In addition, it also explores the relationship between gender and academic age and leadership positions.

3. **Racial and ethnic minority groups**: Evaluate the proportion of SDSS - IV members who consider themselves as racial or ethnic minority groups, and compare it with the data of other astronomy organizations.

4. **Socio - economic background**: Analyze the socio - economic background of members, such as the educational level of their parents, and the impact of these factors on the members' participation.

5. **Distribution of leadership positions**: Research the distribution of men and women in leadership positions, and whether these positions are formally recognized and funded.

6. **Effectiveness of inclusive policies**: Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy measures taken by SDSS - IV to promote inclusiveness, including the establishment of special committees (such as COINS) to promote an inclusive culture.

7. **Members' perception of the collaborative atmosphere**: Understand the members' views on the SDSS - IV collaborative atmosphere, especially whether they think this collaborative environment is inclusive.

Through these analyses, the paper aims to reveal the current situation of SDSS - IV in terms of diversity, inclusiveness and fairness, and put forward improvement suggestions to optimize its scientific output and ensure that all members can fully realize their potential.

### Main findings

- **Geographical location**: Approximately half of the SDSS - IV members are located in North America, a quarter in Europe, and the rest are distributed in Asia and Central and South America.

- **Gender ratio**: Between 2014 and 2016, the proportion of female members was 26% - 36%, and non - binary gender members accounted for about 2%. The proportion of female members decreased in higher - level positions, and they were less likely to hold leadership positions.

- **Racial and ethnic minority groups**: 11% - 14% of the members considered themselves as racial or ethnic minority groups in their institutions.

- **Socio - economic background**: The proportion of SDSS - IV members whose parents have a doctorate degree is much higher than that of the general population, but the proportion of first - generation college students is also relatively high (31%), especially among minority members, this proportion is even higher (40% - 50%).

- **Leadership positions**: Male members are more likely to hold leadership positions, and these positions are more likely to be formally recognized and funded.

- **Inclusive policies**: More than 60% of the members think that SDSS - IV is an inclusive collaborative environment, but the leadership has a stronger sense of identity.

### Conclusions and recommendations

The paper summarizes the above findings and puts forward several suggestions to further improve the diversity and inclusiveness in large - scale astronomical cooperation. These suggestions are not only helpful to improve the ethical standards of scientific research teams, but also can optimize scientific output.