Phase Diagram of Nickelate Superconductors Calculated by Dynamical Vertex Approximation
Karsten Held,Liang Si,Paul Worm,Oleg Janson,Ryotaro Arita,Zhicheng Zhong,Jan M. Tomczak,Motoharu Kitatani,Karsten Held,Liang Si,Paul Worm,Oleg Janson,Ryotaro Arita,Zhicheng Zhong,Jan M. Tomczak,Motoharu Kitatani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.810394
IF: 3.718
2022-01-21
Frontiers in Physics
Abstract:We review the electronic structure of nickelate superconductors with and without effects of electronic correlations. As a minimal model, we identify the one-band Hubbard model for the Ni 3 d x 2 − y 2 orbital plus a pocket around the A -momentum. The latter, however, merely acts as a decoupled electron reservoir. This reservoir makes a careful translation from nominal Sr-doping to the doping of the one-band Hubbard model mandatory. Our dynamical mean-field theory calculations, in part already supported by the experiment, indicate that the Γ pocket, Nd 4 f orbitals, oxygen 2 p , and the other Ni 3 d orbitals are not relevant in the superconducting doping regime. The physics is completely different if topotactic hydrogen is present or the oxygen reduction is incomplete. Then, a two-band physics hosted by the Ni 3 d x 2 − y 2 and 3 d 3 z 2 − r 2 orbitals emerges. Based on our minimal modeling, we calculated the superconducting T c vs. Sr-doping x phase diagram prior to the experiment using the dynamical vertex approximation. For such a notoriously difficult to determine quantity as T c , the agreement with the experiment is astonishingly good. The prediction that T c is enhanced with pressure or compressive strain has been confirmed experimentally as well. This supports that the one-band Hubbard model plus an electron reservoir is the appropriate minimal model.
physics, multidisciplinary