Abstract:Traditionally, designs are written in Verilog hardware description language (HDL) and debugged by hardware engineers. While this approach is effective, it is time-consuming and error-prone for complex designs. Large language models (LLMs) are promising in automating HDL code generation. LLMs are trained on massive datasets of text and code, and they can learn to generate code that compiles and is functionally accurate. We aim to evaluate the ability of LLMs to generate functionally correct HDL models. We build AutoChip by combining the interactive capabilities of LLMs and the output from Verilog simulations to generate Verilog modules. We start with a design prompt for a module and the context from compilation errors and debugging messages, which highlight differences between the expected and actual outputs. This ensures that accurate Verilog code can be generated without human intervention. We evaluate AutoChip using problem sets from HDLBits. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of the AutoChip using several LLMs and problem categories. The results show that incorporating context from compiler tools, such as Icarus Verilog, improves the effectiveness, yielding 24.20% more accurate Verilog. We release our evaluation scripts and datasets as open-source contributions at the following link <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/shailja-thakur/AutoChip" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve The paper aims to address issues in the hardware description language (HDL) design process, particularly the time-consuming and error-prone nature of writing Verilog code. Traditional HDL design methods rely on hardware engineers manually writing and debugging code, which is not only inefficient but also prone to errors when dealing with complex designs. The paper proposes an automated tool called AutoChip, which uses large language models (LLMs) to generate and optimize Verilog code, improving code quality through an iterative feedback mechanism. ### Specific Problems and Solutions 1. **Inefficiency and Error-Prone Nature of Manual HDL Code Writing**: - **Problem**: In traditional methods, hardware engineers need to manually write and debug Verilog code, which is time-consuming and error-prone, especially when handling complex designs. - **Solution**: AutoChip uses large language models (LLMs) to automatically generate initial Verilog modules and iteratively optimize the code through feedback from compilers and simulation tools, gradually improving the code. 2. **Lack of Automated Feedback Mechanism**: - **Problem**: Existing LLM methods for generating HDL code typically use a zero-shot approach, where the code is generated once and then manually debugged by developers, wasting significant human resources. - **Solution**: AutoChip introduces a fully automated feedback-driven framework that uses output information from compilers and simulation tools to automatically guide the LLM in code correction, reducing the need for manual intervention. 3. **Improving the Quality of Generated Code**: - **Problem**: Zero-shot generated HDL code often contains functional and compilation errors. - **Solution**: AutoChip corrects these errors through multiple rounds of iterative feedback, ultimately generating high-quality Verilog code. Experimental results show that compared to zero-shot methods, AutoChip's generated code passed more test cases, with a 24.2% improvement in functional correctness. ### Experimental Validation To evaluate the effectiveness of AutoChip, the authors conducted experiments using a problem set from the HDLBits platform, covering various issues from basic syntax to complex circuit design. The experimental results indicate: - **Importance of Feedback Mechanism**: The feedback mechanism significantly improved the quality of the generated code, with even a single feedback iteration greatly increasing the proportion of test cases passed. - **Impact of Iteration Count**: Increasing the number of feedback iterations further enhanced code quality. For example, Claude 2's Pass@1 improved from 37.50% to 47.50% after 10 iterations. - **Concise Feedback vs. Full Context**: Concise feedback (containing only the error information from the most recent iteration) was more effective in improving code quality and reducing compilation errors than full context feedback, while also lowering model usage costs. - **Effect of LLM Combination**: Combining small LLMs (such as GPT-3.5) with large LLMs (such as GPT-4) can further improve the success rate of generated code while reducing costs. ### Conclusion By introducing an automated feedback mechanism, AutoChip significantly improves the quality and efficiency of HDL code generation, reducing the workload of manual debugging. This method is not only suitable for simple HDL designs but also capable of handling complex circuit design problems, showing broad application prospects.

AutoChip: Automating HDL Generation Using LLM Feedback

Can EDA Tool Feedback Improve Verilog Generation by LLMs?

Accelerating Chip Design with Machine Learning: from Pre-Silicon to Post-Silicon

Chip-Chat: Challenges and Opportunities in Conversational Hardware Design

ChatChisel: Enabling Agile Hardware Design with Large Language Models

AutoBench: Automatic Testbench Generation and Evaluation Using LLMs for HDL Design

Data is all you need: Finetuning LLMs for Chip Design via an Automated design-data augmentation framework

ChipExpert: The Open-Source Integrated-Circuit-Design-Specific Large Language Model

HDLdebugger: Streamlining HDL debugging with Large Language Models

Benchmarking Large Language Models for Automated Verilog RTL Code Generation

Rome was Not Built in a Single Step: Hierarchical Prompting for LLM-based Chip Design

LLM-Aided Efficient Hardware Design Automation

Evaluating LLMs for Hardware Design and Test

LLM4EDA: Emerging Progress in Large Language Models for Electronic Design Automation

VerilogCoder: Autonomous Verilog Coding Agents with Graph-based Planning and Abstract Syntax Tree (AST)-based Waveform Tracing Tool

AutoCkt: Deep Reinforcement Learning of Analog Circuit Designs

From English to ASIC: Hardware Implementation with Large Language Model

GPT4AIGChip: Towards Next-Generation AI Accelerator Design Automation via Large Language Models

Efficient Test Chip Design via Smart Computation

Towards LLM-Powered Verilog RTL Assistant: Self-Verification and Self-Correction

Classification-Based Automatic HDL Code Generation Using LLMs