Abstract:Effective human-robot teaming (HRT) increasingly requires humans to work with intelligent, autonomous machines. However, novel features of intelligent autonomous systems such as social agency and incomprehensibility may influence the human's trust in the machine. The human operator's mental model for machine functioning is critical for trust. People may consider an intelligent machine partner as either an advanced tool or as a human-like teammate. This article reports a study that explored the role of individual differences in the mental model in a simulated environment. Multiple dispositional factors that may influence the dominant mental model were assessed. These included the Robot Threat Assessment (RoTA), which measures the person's propensity to apply tool and teammate models in security contexts. Participants (N = 118) were paired with an intelligent robot tasked with making threat assessments in an urban setting. A transparency manipulation was used to influence the dominant mental model. For half of the participants, threat assessment was described as physics-based (e.g., weapons sensed by sensors); the remainder received transparency information that described psychological cues (e.g., facial expression). We expected that the physics-based transparency messages would guide the participant toward treating the robot as an advanced machine (advanced tool mental model activation), while psychological messaging would encourage perceptions of the robot as acting like a human partner (teammate mental model). We also manipulated situational danger cues present in the simulated environment. Participants rated their trust in the robot's decision as well as threat and anxiety, for each of 24 urban scenes. They also completed the RoTA and additional individual-difference measures. Findings showed that trust assessments reflected the degree of congruence between the robot's decision and situational danger cues, consistent with participants acting as Bayesian decision makers. Several scales, including the RoTA, were more predictive of trust when the robot was making psychology-based decisions, implying that trust reflected individual differences in the mental model of the robot as a teammate. These findings suggest scope for designing training that uncovers and mitigates the individual's biases toward intelligent machines.

ToP-ToM: Trust-aware Robot Policy with Theory of Mind

Enhancing Robot Assistive Behaviour with Reinforcement Learning and Theory of Mind

ToM2C: Target-oriented Multi-agent Communication and Cooperation with Theory of Mind

When Would You Trust a Robot? A Study on Trust and Theory of Mind in Human-Robot Interactions

Enabling Team of Teams: A Trust Inference and Propagation (TIP) Model in Multi-Human Multi-Robot Teams

A Brain-Inspired Model of Theory of Mind

Trust-Aware Decision Making for Human-Robot Collaboration: Model Learning and Planning

Trust-Aware Assistance Seeking in Human-Supervised Autonomy

Toward Mutual Trust Modeling in Human-Robot Collaboration

Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task

TIP: A trust inference and propagation model in multi-human multi-robot teams

Enhancing Human-AI Collaboration Through Logic-Guided Reasoning

Trust in the Danger Zone: Individual Differences in Confidence in Robot Threat Assessments

Theory of Mind Based Assistive Communication in Complex Human Robot Cooperation

Reverse Psychology in Trust-Aware Human-Robot Interaction

Emergence of Theory of Mind Collaboration in Multiagent Systems

Multi-Task Trust Transfer for Human-Robot Interaction

Robot Capability and Intention in Trust-based Decisions across Tasks

Trust-Preserved Human-Robot Shared Autonomy enabled by Bayesian Relational Event Modeling

A brain-inspired theory of mind spiking neural network improves multi-agent cooperation and competition

Functional advantages of an adaptive Theory of Mind for robotics: a review of current architectures