Williams' path decomposition for self-similar Markov processes in $\mathbb{R}^d$

Andreas Kyprianou,Mehar Motala,Víctor Rivero
2023-11-04
Abstract:The classical result due tof Williams states that a Brownian motion with positive drift $\mu$ and issued from the origin is equal in law to a Brownian motion with unit negative drift, $-\mu$, run until it hits a negative threshold, whose depth below the origin is independently and exponentially distributed with parameter $2\mu$, after which it behaves like a Brownian motion conditioned never to go below the aforesaid threshold (i.e. a Bessel-3 process, or equivalently a Brownian motion conditioned to stay positive, relative to the threshold). In this article we consider the analogue of Williams' path decomposition for a general self-similar Markov process (ssMp) on $\mathbb{R}^d$. Roughly speaking, we will prove that law of a ssMp, say $X$, in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is equivalent in law to the concatenation of paths described as follows: suppose that we sample the point $x^*$ according to the law of the point of closest reach to the origin, sample; given $x^*$, we build $X^{\downarrow}$ having the law of $X$ conditioned to hit $x^*$ continuously without entering the ball of radius $|x^*|$; then, we construct $X^\uparrow$ to have the law of $X$ issued from $x^*$ conditioned never to enter the ball of radius $|x^*|$; glueing the path of $X^\uparrow$ end-to-end with $X^\downarrow$ via the point $x^*$ produces a process which is equal in law to our original ssMp $X$. In essence, Williams' path decomposition in the setting of a ssMp follows directly from an analogous decomposition for Markov additive processes (MAPs). The latter class are intimately related to the former via a space-time transform known as the Lamperti--Kiu transform. As a key feature of our proof of Williams' path decomposition, will prove the analogue of Silverstein's duality identity for the excursion occupation measure for general Markov additive processes (MAPs).
Probability
What problem does this paper attempt to address?