Abstract:Fairness is commonly seen as a property of the global outcome of a system and assumes centralisation and complete knowledge. However, in real decentralised applications, agents only have partial observation capabilities. Under limited information, agents rely on communication to divulge some of their private (and unobservable) information to others. When an agent deliberates to resolve conflicts, limited knowledge may cause its perspective of a correct outcome to differ from the actual outcome of the conflict resolution. This is subjective unfairness. As human systems and societies are organised by rules and norms, hybrid human-agent and multi-agent environments of the future will require agents to resolve conflicts in a decentralised and rule-aware way. Prior work achieves such decentralised, rule-aware conflict resolution through cultures: explainable architectures that embed human regulations and norms via argumentation frameworks with verification mechanisms. However, this prior work requires agents to have full state knowledge of each other, whereas many distributed applications in practice admit partial observation capabilities, which may require agents to communicate and carefully opt to release information if privacy constraints apply. To enable decentralised, fairness-aware conflict resolution under privacy constraints, we have two contributions: 1) a novel interaction approach and 2) a formalism of the relationship between privacy and fairness. Our proposed interaction approach is an architecture for privacy-aware explainable conflict resolution where agents engage in a dialogue of hypotheses and facts. To measure the privacy-fairness relationship, we define subjective and objective fairness on both the local and global scope and formalise the impact of partial observability due to privacy in these different notions of fairness. We first study our proposed architecture and the privacy-fairness relationship in the abstract, testing different argumentation strategies on a large number of randomised cultures. We empirically demonstrate the trade-off between privacy, objective fairness, and subjective fairness and show that better strategies can mitigate the effects of privacy in distributed systems. In addition to this analysis across a broad set of randomised abstract cultures, we analyse a case study for a specific scenario: we instantiate our architecture in a multi-agent simulation of prioritised rule-aware collision avoidance with limited information disclosure.

Faster Peace via Inclusivity: An Efficient Paradigm to Understand Populations in Conflict Zones

Interacting for Peace: Rethinking Peace Through Interactive Digital Platforms

Machine Learning for Mediation in Armed Conflicts

Supporting peace negotiations in the Yemen war through machine learning

Narrative interventions in conflict settings: Harnessing the power of narratives to prevent violence and promote peace

The Peace Mediator Effect

Agree to Disagree: Subjective Fairness in Privacy-Restricted Decentralised Conflict Resolution

The Peace Mediator effect: Heterogeneous agents can foster consensus in continuous opinion models

Design-Driven Conflicts: A Design-Oriented Methodology for Mindset and Paradigm Shifts in Human Social Systems

Understanding peacefulness through the world news

Broadening perspectives on inclusive peacemaking: the case of the UN mediation in Syria

Disunited Nations? A Multiplex Network Approach to Detecting Preference Affinity Blocs using Texts and Votes

Participatory co-learning for human-wildlife coexistence: Reflections on a novel program applying systems thinking, nonviolent communication, and learning-based approaches

From acceptance to change: The role of acceptance in the effectiveness of the Informative Process Model for conflict resolution

Enhancing Democratic Processes through Interdisciplinary Research

A Simulation System Towards Solving Societal-Scale Manipulation

Democratic Policy Development using Collective Dialogues and AI

Learning to Become Smart Radicals: A Regenerative Lens on the Potential for Peace and Reconciliation through Youth and Education Systems

Stabilizing Civil Wars without Peacekeeping: Evidence from South Asia

Evaluating an automated mediator for joint narratives in a conflict situation

Bridging Systems: Open Problems for Countering Destructive Divisiveness across Ranking, Recommenders, and Governance